Cancer Therapy Vol 2, 121-129, 2004
Antiangiogenesis in prostate cancer
Michael C. Cox1,
Yinong Liu2, William D. Figg1,2
1Clinical Pharmacology Research Core, Medical Oncology
Clinical Research Unit and 2Molecular Pharmacology
Section, Cancer Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: William D. Figg, PharmD, National Cancer Institute, 10
Center Dr, Bldg 10, Room 5A-01, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Phone:
(301)-402-3622, Fax: (301) 402-8606. Email: wdfigg@helix.nih.gov
Key Words: Antiangiogenesis, prostate
cancer,
Abbreviations: 2-methoxyestradiol, (2ME); androgen independent prostate cancer, (AIPC); Cyclooxygenases, (COXs); luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone, (LHRH); Matrix metalloproteinases, (MMPs); multiple myeloma, (MM); National Cancer Institute, (NCI); prostate specific antigen, (PSA); prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, (PIN); Recombinant humanized anti-VEGF, (RhuMAb VEGF); specific cyclin-dependent kinase, (cdk); Vascular endothelial growth factor, (VEGF)
Summary
Metastatic
prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related death. While
androgen ablation is an effective initial modality, progression of disease is
eventually occurred in majority patients. The benefit of chemotherapy in
overall survival is still unclear. Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role for the
growth, invasion, and metastasis of prostate cancer. Therefore,
antiangiogenesis is a promising new therapeutic modality. Currently, there are
more than 20 antiangiogenic agents in various stages of clinical trials. We
will discuss current knowledge on controlling tumor angiogenesis and advances
in the development of antiangiogenic agents with promising antitumor activity
in prostate cancer.
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in
American men and the second leading cause of cancer related deaths (29,900
deaths estimated in 2004) (Rini et al, 2001; Jemal et al, 2004). It has been
estimated that approximately 20% of men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Since the advent of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, most patients
are found with localized disease. While prostatectomy or radiation treatment is
the standard therapy for early-stage prostate cancer, 30-40% of patients will
develop recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Androgen ablation with either
surgical orchiectomy or the use of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)
agonists with or without antiandrogens is an effective initial modality for
advanced metastatic disease (Figg et al, 1997; Rini et al, 2001). Although a
majority of patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer respond to
hormonal therapy for a median of 18-36 months, disease eventually progresses in
most patients (Figg et al, 1997; Crawford et al, 1989). The utilization of
second line hormonal agents such as corticosteroids, ketoconazole, megestrol
acetate, and bicalutamide is generally associated with low response rates in
this setting (Goktas et al, 1999; Klotz, 2000). Furthermore, such responses are
generally short duration and have no documented survival benefit.
Chemotherapies
have been extensively evaluated in patients with metastatic androgen
independent prostate cancer (AIPC) since the 1970s. The initial studies showed
low response rates and high toxicities. Recently, however, with the development
of new agents targeting prostate cancer both on the cellular and molecular
level, promising results have been emerged. The agents, including docetaxel,
mitoxantrone, estramustine, vinblastine and etoposide, either as a single agent
or as a combination therapy, have showed benefit in clinical response, pain
control, and/or quality of life, with estramustine/docetaxel combination
showing the most promise (Beedassy et al, 1999; Oh, 2000). However, the benefit
in overall survival is still unknown. Therefore, new therapeutic modalities are
needed to prevent progression from early-stage to advanced metastatic disease
and to improve survival outcomes in patients with advanced APIC.
Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels
from the pre-existing vascular bed. It is normally suppressed and is activated
only transiently during menstrual cycles and wound healing process (Folkman,
2001). Uncontrolled angiogenesis also occurs in rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic
retinopathy, as well as neoplastic process. Angiogenesis is a very complicated
process requiring extensive interactions between cells, cytokines, and
extracellular matrix components (Folkman, 2001; Liekens et al, 2001).
Angiogenic vessel growth is normally regulated by a balance of endogenous
stimulators and inhibitors (Table 1).
The angiogenesis regulators are primarily peptide growth factors, proteinases,
or cell adhesion molecules. During angiogenesis, the cooperation and
interaction of these regulators leads to endothelial cell proliferation,
migration, invasion of the basement membrane, differentiation and
capillary-tube formation. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key
role in normal and abnormal angiogenesis since it stimulates almost every step
in the angiogenesic process (Folkman, 2001; Liekens et al, 2001). Other factors
that have been shown to stimulate angiogenesis include acidic and basic
fibroblast growth factor, angiogenin, angiopoietin, E-selectrin, fibroblast
growth factor-4, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, interleukin-8,
placental growth factor, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor,
platelet-derived growth factor, pleiotropin, proliferin, tumor necrosis factor-a and transforming growth factor-a,b.
These endogenous angiogenic stimulators induce new blood vessel formation by
either acting on endothelial cells or activating a broad range of other target
cells and cell-cell interactions. Endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors include
angiostatin, endostatin, thrombospondin-1,-2, antithrombin III, fibronectin,
and many others (Table 1). The
function of these inhibitors is to suppress new vessel formation or to turn off
the transient process during physiological angiogenesis.
Angiogenesis
ultimately is the culmination of a cascade of many events. Before new blood
vessels form, the basement membrane and matrix must be broken down because
these materials ordinarily serve as a supportive matrix and a barrier to
endothelial cell migration (Liekens et al, 2001). This process is usually
accomplished by the proteolytic activity with different enzymes. Matrix
metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of zinc- and calcium-containing proteolytic
enzymes, are the most important enzymes in maintaining extracellular matrix
tissue homeostasis and initiating new blood vessel formation (Wojtowicz-Praga
et al, 1996; Brown, 1997). MMPs are secreted as precursor zymogens and
activated in the extracellular matrix. More than a dozen MMPs have been
identified, with MMP2 and MMP9 being particularly important in primary and
metastatic tumor growth. These are critical factors in basement membrane
degradation to facilitate invasion of malignant cells and angiogenesis (Brown,
1996; Nemeth et al, 2002). Studies
have demonstrated that excessive MMP activity and/or overexpression occur in
colorectal, lung, gastric, malignant glioblastoma, prostate and many other
solid tumors (Curran et al, 1999; Liekens et al, 2001). It also has been shown
that there is a good correlation between the level of MMPs and the
aggressiveness of the tumors (Parsons et al, 1997).
Angiogenesis
plays a pivotal role for the growth, invasion, and metastasis of solid
malignant tumors (Folkman, 1990). Since a growing tumor requires an extensive
capillary network to provide nutrients, a tumor will not grow beyond a few
cubic millimeters without the development of new vessels. These newly formed
vessels also provide a disseminating and metastatic route for cancer cells. In
1971, Folkman first proposed that tumor growth and metastasis are an
angiogenesis-dependent processes and that inhibition of angiogenesis can be a
novel anticancer strategy (Folkman, 1971). This hypothesis has been confirmed
by a large body of preclinical and clinical evidence. To initiate new vessel
formation, a tumor must acquire an angiogenic phenotype.
Table 1. Some of the most well-known endogenous regulators of
angiogenesis
Angiogenesis Stimulators Angiogenesis
Inhibitors
Acidic
fibroblast growth factor Angiostatin
Angiogenin Antithrombin
III (fragment)
Angiopoietin
Canstatin
Basic
fibroblast growth factor Endostatin
E-Selectrin Fibronectin
Fibroblast
growth factor (FGF)-4 Interferon
a
and b
Hepatocyte
growth factor/scatter factor Maspin
Interleukin-8 Pigment
epithelium derived factor (PEDF)
Placental
growth factor Platelet
factor-4 (fragment)
Platelet-derived
endothelial cell growth factor Prolactin
(fragment)
Platelet-derived
growth factor
(PDGF) Thrombospondin-1,
2
Pleiotropin Tumstatin
Proliferin Vascular
endothelial growth inhibitor Transforming growth factor (TGF)-a,b Vasostatin
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Once changed to an angiogenic phenotype, the tumor
becomes vascularized and can start to grow exponentially. The transformation to
an angiogenic phenotype depends on a net imbalance of positive and negative
angiogenic factors in tumor cells (10). New capillary formation can result from
the overproduction of stimulators and/or down-regulation of negative
modulators. Importantly, data from animal as well as human tissue studies
suggest that the acquisition of angiogenic phenotype occurs early in tumor
development. For instance, Brem et al, (1978) reported that angiogenic activity
is significantly higher in transplanted hyperplastic breast tissues compared
with normal breast counterparts in a rabbit model.
Prostate
cancer, like other solid tumors, is also angiogenesis dependent. The
development of prostate cancer is a multi-step process, advancing from
high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) to focal carcinoma, then
to invasive carcinoma, and finally to metastatic disease. It is therefore
important to target the molecular events that accompany progression of each
step. Studies have demonstrated that the expression of angiogenesis stimulating
factors such as VEGF, PDGF, and TGF in prostate carcinoma is increased
(Bostwick et al, 1998; Jones et al, 1999; Lissbrant et al, 2001). Moreover, it
has been shown that there is a progressive increase in angiogenesis as prostate
cancer advances through various pathologic stages. Siegal et al reported that
microvessel density (MVD) was higher in prostate cancer tissue than in adjacent
hyperplastic or benign tissue (Siegal et al, 1995). Also, tumor specimens from
patients with clinical prostate cancer have been found to have a remarkably
high degree of vascularization compared with autopsy-identified prostate tumors
from men without clinical disease (Wakui et al, 1992). Furthermore, studies
have demonstrated that the intensity of angiogenesis as measured by MVD is a
useful prognostic indicator in prostate cancer. Weidner et al showed that the
mean microvessel count among patients with metastatic disease was 76.8
microvessels/field, as compared with 39.2 microvessels/field for those without
metastases (P<0.0001) (Weidner et al, 1993). Taken together, these reports
indicate that angiogenesis measurement in prostate cancer can be used in
predicting both the potential for development of metastatic disease and patient
outcome.
The
inhibition of angiogenesis, or antiangiogenesis is a promising new therapeutic
anticancer modality. Currently, there are more than 20 antiangiogenic agents in
various stages of phase I, II, and III clinical trials, and the list of drugs
is growing. These agents act at the different steps of the angiogenesis
regulatory pathway, and lead to modulation of the process and inhibition of
tumor growth (Ellis et al, 2002; Giles 2002). Mechanistically, angiogenesis
inhibitors can be subdivided into antagonists of angiogenic stimulators such as
VEGF and their receptors, inhibitors of endothelial cell proliferation and/or
survival, blockers of extracellular matrix degradation (MMP inhibitors), and
drugs with undefined mechanisms (Table 2).
Even though most of antiangiogenic agents are in early phases of clinical
trials, a few of them appear to be clinically effective (Figg et al, 2001a;
Liekens et al, 2001; Ellis et al, 2002; Giles, 2002). Antiangiogenic therapy
has advantages over conventional chemotherapy, such as ease of access of drugs
to the endothelial cells. Because endothelial cells in a tumor are usually
genetically stable, drug resistance is less like to develop with
antiangiogenesis therapy. Furthermore, side effects of antiangiogenic agents
should be negligible since angiogenesis in adults is restricted. However,
because antiangiogenic agents usually simply halt tumor expansion, it is
unlikely that angiogenesis inhibitors will work with the same rapidity as
cytotoxic agents. In addition, since maximal formation of new blood vessels
occurs when minimal tumor burden is present, the best opportunity for
antiangiogenic agents to have a therapeutic impact is when there is minimal
tumor burden. Minimizing tumor burden can be achieved with concurrent with
radiation therapy, hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy.
The following sections discuss recent advances in the
development of antiangiogenic agents that have shown promising antitumor
activity in patients with prostate cancer.
A. Thalidomide and its analog
Thalidomide,
a glutamic acid derivative, is a potent teratogen that causes dysmelia (stunted
limb growth) in humans (Stirling, 2001). It was marketed in Europe as a
nonbarbiturate sedative but was withdrawn 30 years ago because of its
teratogenic effects. It has been postulated that thalidomide-induced limb
defects were secondary to an inhibition of blood vessel growth in the
developing fetal limb bugs. In 1994, DÕAmato et al demonstrated that
thalidomide inhibited bFGF-induced angiogenesis (DÕAmato, 1994). Bauer et al subsequently
determined that a metabolite of thalidomide was responsible for this
antiangiogenic activity (Bauer et al, 1998). Thalidomide was later shown to
inhibit the growth of V2 carcinoma and Lewis lung carcinoma in animal models by
antiangiogenic mechanisms.
These
preclinical findings led to clinical testing of thalidomide as an anticancer
drug. In recently years, thalidomide has been shown to produce clinical
activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), glioblastoma multiforme, and
prostate cancer (Figg et al, 2001a,b; Stirling, 2001). In our phase II trial
conducted at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), 63 metastatic AIPC patients
who were heavily pretreated with hormonal and/or chemotherapy were treated with
thalidomide. Twenty-seven percent of patients achieved a PSA response (Figg et
al, 2001a), and the inhibition of PSA was associated with an improvement of
clinical symptoms in majority cases. However, there was no apparent correlation
between microvessel counts in pretreatment tissue biopsies and responses to
thalidomide in this clinical trial. Similarly, a clear correlation between VEGF
and bFGF expression and responses could not be made via assessment of
pretreatment biopsy specimens.
Table 2. Angiogenesis
inhibitors in prostate cancer.
Drug Mode
of Sponsor Phase Results
action
Anti-VEGF
ABX Anti-VEGF NCI,
Genetech II
in AIPC patients No
effects
CC-5013 ø TNF-a Celgene I
in solid tumor (including prostate cancer) Pending
Celecoxib
COX2-I Pharmacia Phase
I trial Pending
Marimastat MMP-I British
Biotech I
in stage III/IV Decrease
the rate of rise of PSA
2-ME ? EntreMed
I
in solid tumor (including prostate cancer) Pending
Prinomastat
MMP-I Agouron
III
in AIPC patients with mitoxantrone/prednisone.No benefit
SU6416 Anti-VEGF SUGEN II
in AIPC patients No
effects
Thalidomide multiple Celgene II
in AIPC with or without docetexel Promising
proposed Phase
III in D0 patients Pending
TNP-470 CDK-I TAP
I
in solid tumor (including prostate cancer) No
effects
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; TNF-a = tissue necrosis factor-a; COX2-I = cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitor; MMP-I = matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor; CDK-I = cyclin dependent
kinase inhibitor
In another
recent phase II trial of weekly docetaxel with thalidomide in 75 patients with
metastatic AIPC (Figg et al, 2001b), 50% of patients receiving
docetaxel/thalidomide and 35% of those receiving docetaxel alone had a PSA
decrease of at least 50%. While the median overall survival and 18-month
survival in docetaxel group were 15.9 months and 47.2%, respectively, the
18-month survival in combination group was 69.3%, and the median overall
survival has not been reached in this group (Dahut et al, 2004). This result
strongly suggests that the combination of a cytotoxic agent with an
angiogenesis inhibitor is a promising area of investigation for prostate cancer
management. Thalidomide was well tolerated in vast majority of patients.
Constipation, dizziness, edema, fatigue and rebound insomnolence after coming
off study were the most common side effects. Thrombotic events occurred in the
thalidomide/docetaxel combination treatment that can be prevented by
prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (Horne et al, 2003).
Thalidomide
is now undergoing many clinical trials for the treatment of a wide variety of
tumors. At the NCI, a double-blinded randomized phase III study of thalidomide
versus placebo in patients with stage D0 androgen dependent prostate cancer was
recently initiated. The goal of this study is to determine if thalidomide can
improve the efficacy of the LHRH agonist in hormone-responsive patients with a
rising PSA after primary definitive therapy (surgery or radiation) for prostate
cancer.
CC-5013, a-(3-aminophthalimido) glutarimide, is an
analogue of thalidomide. In vitro
studies have shown that CC-5013 is more potent than thalidomide in inhibiting
TNF-a production
and MM cell proliferation (Celgene Corporation, Inc, unpublished
data). In the rat aortic ring angiogenesis assay,
CC-5013 demonstrated a potent inhibitory effect on microvessel outgrowth (Figg
et al, 2002). In vivo, CC-5013 showed
the inhibitory effects on growth of MM cell
line (HS-Sultan). Furthermore, according to preliminary non-clinical and
clinical studies conducted to date, CC-5013 appears to lack the sedative and
teratogenic activity of thalidomide.
In two phase I studies in MM, a total of 39 patients with relapsed or refractory disease have been treated with CC-5013. Patients received doses ranging from 5 mg to 50 mg daily of CC-5013. It was well tolerated with principal side effects being bone marrow suppression, myalgia, fatigue, headache, constipation, diarrhea, ringing in ears, lightheadedness, and mild elevated LFT and creatinine. In one study conducted at the University of Arkansas, myeloma response was seen at the higher dosages of CC-5013. Four of 15 patients had a greater than 25% reduction (1 patient > 75%) in paraprotein level. Ten of 14 evaluable patients treated at the Dana Farber Cancer Center responded to the drug, including 3 patients with > 50% and 7 patients with 25-50% reduction in paraprotein level. At the NCI, a phase I trial of CC-5013 is currently conducting in patients with solid tumors, including metastatic AIPC, to further study its clinical antitumor activity.
B. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPs)
In recently years, several MMPs inhibitors, such as
batimastat, marimastat, prinomastat, and COL-3, have been developed as
anticancer drugs and are being actively evaluated in preclinical studies and
ongoing clinical trials (Nemunaitis et al, 1998; Macaulay et al, 1999; Heath et
al, 2001; Rudek et al, 2001; Ahmann et al, 2002). Batimastat is almost
completely insoluble, and consequently, has a very poor bioavailability with
oral route. Therefore, the clinical usage of batimastat is limited.
Marimastat
has a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against most of the major MMPs;
including MMP2 and MMP9 (Nemunaitis et al, 1998). Marimastat is almost
completely absorbed after oral administration with a half-life of approximately
15 hours. It has been evaluated extensively in clinical trials in different
solid tumors with promising activity in patients with pancreatic and colorectal
cancer. A total of 88 patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer were
evaluated in 6 phase I trials. Marimastat was administrated orally for 4 weeks.
The therapeutic response was measured by decrease in the rate of rise of serum
PSA. In these studies Marimastat was demonstrated to reduce the rate of rise of
serum PSA in a dose-dependent manner (Nemunaitis et al 1998 However, the
significance in the change of the PSA slope is unclear. Marimastat has been
well tolerated. The principal side effect was dose-related joint pain and
stiffness.
Prinomastat
is a selective inhibitor of MMP2/MMP3/MMP9. It has been demonstrated that
prinomastat inhibits the growth of PC-3 cells in an animal model (Shalinsky et
al, 1999). Prinomastat was well tolerated with principal side effect being mild
musculoskeletal toxicity in early clinical trials. In a recent phase III trial,
406 patients with chemotherapy-naive AIPC were randomized into
mitoxantrone/prednisone with or without prinomastat. No significant difference
in PSA response rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival in two
groups was observed (Ahmann et al, 2002). While this result showed no benefit
by addition of prinomastat to chemotherapy in AIPC, it does not preclude the
use of Prinomastat in the treatment of early stage of prostate cancer.
Alendronate, a bisphosphonate and an inhibitor of
osteoclastic bone resorption, has been shown to decrease MMP2 and MMP9
secretion in animal models (39). Also, recent studies demonstrated that
bisphosphonates have antitumor effect in
vivo animal systems and promoting apoptosis of tumor cells in vitro (Diel et al, 1998; Powles et
al, 1998). Stearns et al evaluated the combination of alendronate and
paclitaxol on human PC3ML cell bone metastases in SCID mice (Stearns et al,
1996). The pretreatment of SCID mice with alendronate partially blocked the
establishment of bone metastases by PC3ML cells and resulted in tumor formation
in the peritoneum and other soft tissues. When used separately, alendronate and
paclitaxel partially inhibited MMP2 production, but the combination totally
blocked protease production and release. Based on these preclinical results,
the NCI recently completed a randomized phase II trial of ketoconazole (KT) and
alendronate (AL) versus KT in 72 patients with progressive AIPC metastatic to
bone. The proportion of patients with a > 50% decline in PSA was similar in
the 2 groups (47.2% in KT/AL group vs 44.4% in KT group). However, there was a
strong trend toward a prolonged duration of response in KT/AL group compared to
ketoconazole group (median, 8.9months vs 6.3 months, respective; p=0.055), and
more patients in KT/AL group have not progressed (Liu et al, 2002). This result
suggests that alendronate, a potential antiangiogenic agent, improves duration
of response in patients with AIPC treated with ketoconazole.
C. TNP-470
TNP-470, a semi-synthetic derivative of fumagillin,
was one of the first antiangiogenic compounds to undergo clinical testing
(Kruger et al, 2000). Fumagillin is an antibiotic secreted by Aspergillus fumigatus fresenius (Ingber
et al, 1990). It was subsequently found that fumagillin is a very potent
inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation in
vitro and tumor-induced angiogenesis in
vivo (Ingber et al, 1990; Kruger et al, 2000). However, the clinical
utility of fumagillin was limited because it caused profound weight loss in
animal studies. Therefore, several synthetic analogues were developed, and
among these, TNP-470 has shown the least toxicity with the greatest
antiangiogenic activity (Ingber et al 1990; Kusaka et al, 1991). In vitro studies revealed that TNP-470
inhibited endothelial cell proliferation in a very low concentration (Kusaka et
al, 1994). In vivo, TNP-470 has been
demonstrated to be a potent antiangiogenic agent in the chick chorioallantoic
assay, rat corneal micropocket assay, and in the rat blood vessel organ culture
assay (Ingber et al, 1990; Kusaka et al, 1991; Kruger et al, 2000).
Furthermore, TNP-470 inhibited the growth of Lewis lung carcinoma, B16
melanoma, and other tumors in animal models (Ingber et al, 1990; Kusaka et al,
1991; OÕReilly et al, 1995). The molecular target of TNP-470 appears to involve
transcription inhibition of specific cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) and cyclin
gene family members (Koyama et al, 1996). It might also inhibit cdc2 and cdk2
kinase activation in endothelial cells (Kato et al, 1994).
Several phase I studies of TNP-470 have been completed
in patients with KaposiÕs sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, brain cancer, breast
cancer, cervical cancer and prostate cancer (Figg et al, 1997; Bhargava et al,
1999; Stadler et al, 1999; Logothetis et al, 2001). These phase I trials often
showed that TNP-470 resulted in minor objective responses and was well
tolerated. The major dose-limiting toxicities were reversible neurotoxicities,
including fatigue, asthenia, nystagmus, diplopia, ataxia, depression and loss
of concentration. Interestingly, although antitumor activity was not documented
in patients with AIPC, TNP-470 caused a transient increase of serum PSA. It was
subsequently found that TNP-470 enhances PSA transcription in vitro culture systems (Horti er al, 1999).
D. 2-methoxyestradiol
2-methoxyestradiol (2ME) is a natural metabolite of
the endogenous estrogens estradiol-17b and 17-ethynylestradiol (Seegers et al, 1989). In contrast to most
estrogens, 2-ME has been shown in preclinical studies to be potentially
efficacious in the treatment of cancer. In
vitro, 2ME has potent antiproliferative activity in many human cancer cell
lines, including Hela cells, Jurkat leukemia cells, and neuroblastoma cells (Seegers
et al, 1989, Cushman et al, 1995, and Nakagawa-Yagi et al, 1996). Human breast
cancer cell lines are particular sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of 2-ME
irrespective of the estrogen receptor status. In vivo, 2-ME has potent activity in primary and metastatic tumor
models. Its activity was evident in xenograft models derived from a
non-estrogen-dependent human breast tumor cell line (MDA MB-435), MethA
sarcoma, B16 melanoma, neuroblastoma, and myeloma (Fotsis et al, 1994, Klauber
et al, 1997; Arbiser et al, 1999; Schumacher et al, 2001).
The mechanism of action of 2-ME has not yet been
determined, but studies have shown that 2-ME has a potent inhibitory effect on
the proliferation of blood-vessel endothelial cells in vitro (Fotsis et al, 1994). Additional studies have demonstrated
that 2-ME causes apoptosis in cultured arterial endothelial cells and inhibits
the migration of these vascular endothelial cells (Yue et al, 1997). In vivo, 2-ME has been shown to be a
potent antiangiogenic agent in tumor vasculature studies and many other models
(Fotsis et al, 1994, Klauber et al, 1994; Zhu et al, 1998). A phase I clinical
trial of 2-ME in metastatic breast cancer patients was recently initiated
(Miller et al, 2001). To date 2-ME has been well tolerated, and no
dose-limiting toxicity noted. 2-ME treatment did not alter hormonal status in
these patients. Ten out fifteen patients had stable disease. At the NCI, we are
currently conducting a phase I trial of 2-ME in patients with solid tumors,
including metastatic AIPC, to further explore its clinical benefit, biological
as well as molecular activities.
Cetuximab (IMC-C225, anti-EGFR MAb, Erbitux (Imclone,
Bristol-Meyers Squibb Oncology)) was studied alone and in combination with
paclitaxel in a murine model. Cetuximab alone and in combination significantly
decreased growth of the PC-3M-LN4, in
vivo. A decreased serum concentration of interleukin-8 as well as a
decrease in MVD, and tumor cell proliferation and an enhanced of apoptosis were
all enhanced by coadministration of paclitaxel (Karahima, 2002).
A. Cyclooxygenases inhibitors
Prostaglandins and their derivatives
are signaling lipophilic molecules that regulate many physiologic processes
including the inflammatory response, platelet aggression, clot formation, and
gastric cyto-protection (Dang et al, 2002). Cyclooxygenases (COXs) are key
enzymes in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostagladins. There are two
isoforms of the COXs. COX-1 is a constitutive enzyme that is present in most
normal tissues and is responsible for local prostaglandin synthesis. In
contrast, COX-2 is an inducible form that is normally only expressed at a low
level in some tissues, such as brain and kidney. COX-2 synthesis is induced by
a variety of stimuli, including inflammatory cytokines, growth factors,
oncogenes (HER2/neu and Src), tumor promoters and carcinogens (Kosaka et al,
1994; Vadlamudi et al, 1999; Dang et al, 2002). Studies showed that excessive
COX-2 overexpression occurs in colorectal, lung, gastric, breast, prostate and
many other solid tumors (Eberhart et al, 1994; Ristimaki et al, 1997; Hida et
al, 1998; Hwang et al, 1998; Gupta et al, 2000; Dang et al, 2002). Also,
accumulating evidence suggests that elevated prostaglandin expression is
associated with tumor growth, metastatic potential and recurrence in a variety
spectrum of tumor types. Uotila et al showed that the expression of COX-2 in
prostate cancer cells is higher compared with normal glandular epithelial of
control prostates (Uotila et al, 2001). Although the mechanism is unclear,
overexpression of COX-2 may affect different steps in the process of
carcinogenesis, such as immune regulation, cell invasion and proliferation, or
apoptosis. Recently, studies demonstrated that there is a strong link between
COX-2 expression and hypoxia-induced tumor angiogenesis (Liu et al, 1998).
Therefore, COX-2 overexpression may increase tumor blood supply and contribute
to tumor growth.
In prostate cancer, studies have shown that COX-2
inhibitors could induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells in vitro (Liu et al, 1998). In addition, Celecoxib, an elective
COX-2 inhibitor, has been shown to be a potent antitumor and a chemoprevention
agent in a DMBA-induced rat mammary tumor model (Alshafie et al, 2000).
Furthermore, Kirschenbaum et al reported that the COX-2 inhibitors decrease MVD
and angiogenesis in prostate cancer tumor models (Liu et al, 2000). Based upon
these preclinical observations, COX-2 inhibitors, the potential
antiangiogenesis agents, have been tested as chemoprevention as well as
treatment modalities. Several clinical trials reported that Celecoxib and other
NSAIDs have chemoprevention effects on intestinal adenomas in patients with
familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (Waddell, et al, 1983, Hawk et al, 1999;
Steinbach et al, 2000). Currently, exisulind, a COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor, is being
evaluated in phase I/II trials in prostate cancer patients, either as a single
agent or in combination with docetaxel. Also, a neoadjuvant trial is currently
conducting in prostate cancer, in which patients are randomized to receive
either celecoxib or placebo prior to radical prostatectomy. The results of
these trials will help to determine the future role of COX-2 inhibitors in the
treatment and chemoprevention of prostate cancer.
This work is supported by the intramural program of
the National Cancer Institute.
This is a US government work. There are no
restrictions on its use.
Ahmann,
FR, Saad F, Mercier R, et al (2002).
Interim results of a phase III study of the matrix metalloprotease inhibotr
Prinomastat in patients having metastatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer
(HRPC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol; abstract 692.
Alshafie
GA, Abou-Issa HM, Seibert K, et al (2000).
Chemotherapeutic evaluation of Celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in a
rat mammary tumor model. Oncol Rep
7,1377-81.
Arbiser
JL, Panigrathy D, Klauber N, et al (1999).
The antiangiogenic agents TNP-470 and 2-methoxyestradiol inhibit the growth of
angiosarcoma in mice. J Am Acad Dermatol
40, 925-9.
Bauer
KS, Dixon SC, Figg WD (1998).
Inhibition of angiogenesis by thalidomide requires metabolic activation, which
is species-dependent. Biochem Pharmacol
55, 1827-34.
Beedassy
A, Cardi G (1999). Chemotherapy in
advanced prostate cancer. Semin Oncol
26, 428-38.
Bhargava P,
Marshall JL, Rizvi N, et al (1999).
A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of TNP-470 administered weekly to patients
with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res
5, 1989-95.
Bok
R, Corry M, Frohlich M, et al (1999).
A phase II trial of humanized monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth
factor antibody (rhuMAb VEGF) in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18, 351a.
Bostwick DG,
Iczkowski KA (1998). Microvessel
assay in prostate cancer: prognostic and therapeutic utility. Semin Urol Oncol 16, 118-23.
Brem SS,
Jensen HM, Gullino PM (1978).
Angiogenesis as a marker of preneoplastic lesions of the human breast. Cancer 41, 239-44.
Brown PD (1997). Matrix metalloproteinase
inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Med
Oncol 14, 1-10.
Crawford
ED, Eisenberger MA, McCleod DG, et al (1989).
A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostate
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 321, 419-24.
Cropp
G, Hannah A, Kabbinavar F, et al (1999).
Phase I dose-escalating trial of SU5416, a novel angiogenesis inhibitor in
patients with advanced malignancies. Pros
ASCO 18, 618.
Curran
S, Murray GI (1999). Matrix
metalloproteinases in tumour invasion and metastasis. J Pathol 189, 300-8.
Cushman M, He
HM, Katzenellenbogen JA, et al (1995).
Synthesis, antitubulin and antimitotic activity, and cytotoxicity of analogs of
2-methoxyestradiol, an endogenous mammalian metabolite of estradiol that
inhibits tubulin polymerization by binding to the colchicine binding site. J Med Chem 38, 2041-9.
D'Amato RJ,
Loughnan MS, Flynn E, et al (1994).
Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 4082-5.
Dahut
WL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Liu Y, et al. (2004)
A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus thalidomide in
androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. In press.
Dang
CT, Shapiro CL, Hudis CA (2002).
Potential role of selective COX-2 inhibitors in cancer management. Oncology 16, 30-36.
Diel
IJ, Solomayer EF, Costa SD, et al (1998).
Reduction in new metastases in breast cancer with adjuvant clodronate
treatment. N Engl J Med 339, 357-63.
Eberhart
CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, et al (1994).
Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas
and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology
107, 1183-8.
Ellis
LM, Liu W, Fan F, et al (2002).
Synopsis of angiogenesis inhibitors in oncology. Oncology 16, 14-22.
Figg
WD, Feuer J, Bauer KS (1997).
Management of hormone-sensative metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Practice 5, 258-263.
Figg
WD, Pluda JM, Lush RM, et al (1997).
The pharmacokinetics of TNP-470, a new angiogenesis inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 17, 91-7.
Figg
WD, Dahut W, Duray P, et al (2001).
A randomized phase II trial of thalidomide, an angiogenesis inhibitor, in
patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7, 1888-93.
Figg
WD, Arlen P, Gulley J, et al (2001).
A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide in
androgen-independent prostate cancer. Semin
Oncol 28(4S15), 62-6.
Figg
WD, Kruger EA, Price DK, et al (2002).
Inhibition of angiogenesis: treatment options for patients with metastatic
prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs 20,
183-94.
Folkman
J (1971). Tumor angiogenesis:
therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med
285, 1182-6.
Folkman
J (1990). What is the evidence that
tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J
Natl Cancer Inst. 82, 4-6.
Folkman
J (2001). Angiogenesis-dependent
diseases. Semin Oncol 28: 36-42.
Fotsis
T, Zhang Y, Pepper MS, et al (1994).
The endogenous oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol inhibits angiogenesis
and suppresses tumour growth. Nature
368, 237-9.
Giles
FJ (2002). The emerging role of
angiogenesis inhibitors in hematologic malignancies. Oncology 16, 22-29.
Goktas
S, Crawford ED (1999). Optimal
hormonal therapy for advanced prostatic carcinoma. Semin Oncol 26, 162-73.
Gupta
S, Srivastava M, Ahmad N, et al (2000).
Over-expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human prostate adenocarcinoma. Prostate 42, 73-8.
Hawk
E, Lubet R, Limburg P (1999).
Chemoprevention in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Cancer 86, 2551-63.
Heath
EI, O'Reilly S, Humphrey R, et al (2001).
Phase I trial of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY12-9566 in patients
with advanced solid tumors. Cancer
Chemother Pharmacol 48, 269-74.
Hida
T, Yatabe Y, Achiwa H, et al (1998).
Increased expression of cyclooxygenase 2 occurs frequently in human lung
cancers, specifically in adenocarcinomas. Cancer
Res 58, 3761-4.
Horne
ME 3rd, Figg WD, Arlen P, et al (2003). Increased frequency of venous thromboembolism with the
combination of docetaxel and thalidomide in patients with metastatic
androgen-independent prostate cancer. Pharmacotherapy
23, 315-8.
Horti
J, Dixon SC, Logothetis CJ, et al (1999).
Increased transcriptional activity of prostate-specific antigen in the presence
of TNP-470, an angiogenesis inhibitor. Br
J Cancer 79, 1588-93.
Hwang
D, Scollard D, Byrne J, et al (1998).
Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:455-60.
Ingber
D, Fujita T, Kishimoto S, et al (1990).
Synthetic analogues of fumagillin that inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumour
growth. Nature 348, 555-7.
Jemal
A, Thomas A, Murray T, et al (2004).
Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J
Clin 54, 8-29.
Jones
A, Fujiyama C (1999). Angiogenesis
in urological malignancy: prognostic indicator and therapeutic target. BJU Int 83, 535-55.
Karashima
T, Sweeney P, Slaton, JW et al (2002).
Inhibition of angiogenesis by the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody
ImClone C225 in androgen-independent prostate cancer growing orthotopically in
nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 8.
1253-1264.
Kato T, Sato
K, Kakinuma H, et al (1994).
Enhanced suppression of tumor growth by combination of angiogenesis inhibitor
O-(chloroacetyl-carbamoyl)fumagillol (TNP-470) and cytotoxic agents in mice. Cancer Res 54, 5143-7.
Kim
KJ, Li B, Winer J, at al (1993).
Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis
suppresses tumour growth in vivo. Nature
362, 841-4.
Klauber
N, Parangi S, Flynn E, et al (1997).
Inhibition of angiogenesis and breast cancer in mice by the microtubule
inhibitors 2-methoxyestradiol and taxol. Cancer
Res 57(1), 81-6.
Klotz
L (2000). Hormone therapy for
patients with prostate carcinoma. Cancer
88: 3009-14.
Kosaka
T, Miyata A, Ihara H, et al (1994).
Characterization of the human gene (PTGS2) encoding prostaglandin-endoperoxide
synthase 2. Eur J Biochem 221,
889-97.
Koyama H,
Nishizawa Y, Hosoi M, et al (1996).
The fumagillin analogue TNP-470 inhibits DNA synthesis of vascular smooth
muscle cells stimulated by platelet-derived growth factor and insulin-like
growth factor-I. Possible involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Circ Res 79, 757-64.
Kruger
EA, Figg WD (2000). TNP-470: an
angiogenesis inhibitor in clinical development for cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 9, 1383-96.
Kusaka M, Sudo
K, Fujita T, et al (1991). Potent
anti-angiogenic action of AGM-1470: comparison to the fumagillin parent. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 174:1070-6.
Kusaka M, Sudo
K, Matsutani E, et al (1994).
Cytostatic inhibition of endothelial cell growth by the angiogenesis inhibitor
TNP-470 (AGM-1470). Br J Cancer 69,
212-6.
Liekens
S, De Clercq E, Neyts J (2001).
Angiogenesis: regulators and clinical applications. Biochem Pharmacol 61, 253-70.
Lissbrant
IF, Lissbrant E, Damber J, et al (2001).
Blood vessels are regulators of growth, diagnostic markers and therapeutic
targets in prostate cancer. Scan J Urol
Nephrol 35, 437-52.
Liu
XH, Yao S, Kirschenbaum A, et al (1998).
NS398, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, induces apoptosis and
down-regulates bcl-2 expression in LNCaP cells.
Cancer Res 58, 4245-9.
Liu
XH, Kirschenbaum A, Yao S, et al (1999).
Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by cobalt chloride-simulated
hypoxia is mediated by persistent induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in a metastatic
human prostate cancer cell line. Clin
Exp Metastasis 17, 687-94.
Liu
XH, Kirschenbaum A, Yao S, et al (2000).
Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 suppresses angiogenesis and the growth of
prostate cancer in vivo. J Urol 164,
820-5.
Liu
Y, Figg WD, Arlen P, et al (2002). A
randomized phase II trial of ketoconazole (KT) and alendronate (AL) versus
ketoconazole in androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Proc the third North American symposium on
skeletal complications of malignancy. Abstract D4.
Logothetis
CJ, Wu KK, Finn LD, et al (2001).
Phase I trial of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 for progressive
androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin
Cancer Res 7, 1198-203.
Macaulay
VM, O'Byrne KJ, Saunders MP, et al (1999).
Phase I study of intrapleural batimastat (BB-94), a matrix metalloproteinase
inhibitor, in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Clin Cancer Res 5:513-20.
Millauer
B, Wizigmann-Voos S, Schnurch H, et al (1993).
High affinity VEGF binding and developmental expression suggest Flk-1 as a
major regulator of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.
Cell 72, 835-46.
Millauer
B, Longhi MP, Plate KH, et al (1996).
Dominant-negative inhibition of Flk-1 suppresses the growth of many tumor types
in vivo. Cancer Res 56, 1615-20.
Miller
KD, Haney LG, Pribluda VS, et al (2001).
A phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of 2-methoxyestradiol
(2ME2) in patients (Pts) with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20, Abstract
170.
Mordenti
J, Thomsen K, Licko V, et al (1997).
Efficacy and concentration-response of murine anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody in
tumor-bearing mice and extrapolation to humans.
Toxicol Pathol 27, 14-21.
Nakagawa-Yagi
Y, Ogane N, Inoki Y, et al (1996).
The endogenous estrogen metabolite 2-methoxyestradiol induces apoptotic
neuronal cell death in vitro. Life Sci
58, 1461-7.
Nemeth
JA, Yousif R, Herzog M, et al (2002).
Matrix metalloproteinase activity, bone matrix turnover, and tumor cell
proliferation in prostate cancer bone metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst 94, 17-25.
Nemunaitis J, Poole C, Primrose J, et al (1998). Combined analysis of studies of
the effects of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat on serum tumor
markers in advanced cancer: selection of a biologically active and tolerable
dose for longer-term studies. Clin
Cancer Res 4, 1101-1109.
Oh
WK (2000). Chemotherapy for patients
with advanced prostate carcinoma: a new option for therapy. Cancer 88, 3015-21.
O'Reilly
MS, Brem H, Folkman J (1995).
Treatment of murine hemangioendotheliomas with the angiogenesis inhibitor
AGM-1470. J Pediatr Surg 30:325-9.
Parsons
SL, Watson SA, Brown PD, et al (1997).
Matrix metalloproteinases. Br J Surg
84, 160-6.
Picus
J (2004). Docetaxel/bevacizumab
(Avastin) in prostate cancer. Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium XXI, 2004, New
York City. Cancer Investigation 22 (In press). Archieved on-line at www.mssm.edu/ctf (Accessed April 2, 2004).
Powles
TJ, McCloskey E, Paterson AH, et al (1998).
Oral clodronate and reduction in loss of bone mineral density in women with
operable primary breast cancer. J Natl
Cancer Inst 90, 704-8.
Rini
BI, Small EJ (2001). An update on
prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 13,
204-11.
Ristimaki
A, Honkanen N, Jankala H, et al (1997).
Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res 57, 1276-80.
Rudek
MA, Figg WD, Dyer V, et al (2001).
Phase I clinical trial of oral COL-3, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, in
patients with refractory metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 19, 584-92.
Schumacher
G, Neuhaus P (2001). The
physiological estrogen metabolite 2-methoxyestradiol reduces tumor growth and
induces apoptosis in human solid tumors. J
Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127(7), 405-10.
Seegers
JC, Aveling LM, Can Aswegen CH, et al (1989).
The cytotoxic effects of estradiol-17 beta, catecholestradiols and
methoxyestradiols on dividing MCF-7 and HeLa cells. J Steroid Biochem 32, 797-809.
Shalinsky
DR, Brekken J, Zou H, et al (1999).
Broad antitumor and antiangiogenic activities of AG3340, a potent and selective
MMP inhibitor undergoing advanced oncology clinical trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci 878:236-70.
Siegal
JA, Yu E, Brawer MK (1995).
Topography of neovascularity in human prostate carcinoma. Cancer 75, 2545-51.
Stadler
WM, Kuzel T, Shapiro C, et al (1999).
Multi-institutional study of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 in metastatic
renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17,
2541-5.
Stearns
ME, Wang M (1996). Effects of
alendronate and taxol on PC-3 ML cell bone metastases in SCID mice. Invasion Metastasis 16, 116-31.
Stearns ME,
Wang M (1998). Alendronate blocks
metalloproteinase secretion and bone collagen I release by PC-3 ML cells in
SCID mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 16,
693-702.
Steinbach
G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK, et al (2000).
The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous
polyposis. N Engl J Med 342,
1946-52.
Stirling
D (2001). Thalidomide: a novel
template for anticancer drugs. Semin
Oncol 28, 602-6.
Uotila
P, Valve E, Martikainen P, et al (2001).
Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase-2 in human
prostate cancer. Urol Res 29, 23-8.
Vadlamudi
R, Mandal M, Adam L, et al (1999).
Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 pathway by HER2 receptor. Oncogene 18, 305-14.
Waddell
WR, Loughry RW (1983). Sulindac for
polyposis of the colon. J Surg Oncol
24, 83-7.
Wakui
S, Furusato M, Itoh T, et al (1992).
Tumour angiogenesis in prostatic carcinoma with and without bone marrow
metastasis: a morphometric study. J
Pathol 168, 257-62.
Warren
RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, et al (1995).
Regulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of human colon cancer
tumorigenesis in a mouse model of experimental liver metastasis.
J Clin Invest 95, 1789-97.
Weidner
N, Carroll PR, Flax J, et al (1993).
Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143, 401-9.
Wojtowicz-Praga
S, Low J, Marshall J, et al (1996).
Phase I trial of a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimistat (BB-94)
in patients with advanced cancer. Invest
New Drug 14, 193-202.
Yue
TL, Wang X, Louden CS, et al (1997).
2-Methoxyestradiol, an endogenous estrogen metabolite, induces apoptosis in
endothelial cells and inhibits angiogenesis: possible role for stress-activated
protein kinase signaling pathway and Fas expression. Mol Pharmacol 51(6), 951-62.
Zhu
BT, Conney AH (1998). Is
2-methoxyestradiol an endogenous estrogen metabolite that inhibits mammary
carcinogenesis? Cancer Res 58(11),
2269-77.