Cancer Therapy Vol 2, 501-510, 2004
Inhibition of telomerase improves chemosensitivity in
cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer cells
Brenda L. Shoup1,3, Nancy E. Lowell2 and Patricia
A. Kruk2,3*
1Departments
of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2Pathology
and Laboratory Medicine, University of South Florida
3H. Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Patricia
A. Kruk, Ph.D., Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MDC 11,
University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
Tel: 1-(813)-974-0548; Fax: 1-(813)-974-5536; e-mail: pkruk@hsc.usf.edu
Key words: telomerase,
ovarian cancer, cisplatin, drug resistance
Abbreviations:
Cisplatin, (CP); DNA fragmentation factor 45, (DFF45); DulbeccoÕs phosphate
buffered saline, (DPBS); Green fluorescent protein, (GFP); Oligonucleotide,
(ODN); Polymerase chain reaction–enzyme linked immunosorbant assay,
(PCR-ELISA); reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, (RT-PCR); Sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, (SDS-PAGE)
Summary
Telomerase
is expressed in 95% of gynecologic malignancies and in over 90% of epithelial
ovarian carcinomas, contributing to the maintenance of the malignant phenotype
by conferring immortality and enhanced cell survival. Since the development of
drug resistance contributes to the poor prognosis associated with ovarian
cancer, the objective of the current study was to determine if inhibition of
telomerase could impact platinum resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer cells.
The cisplatin (CP)-sensitive, OV2008, and its CP-resistant daughter, C13,
ovarian cancer cell lines were subjected to telomerase inhibition using
telomere sequence specific DNA oligonucleotides and a 2-O-(methyl) RNA
oligomer, in the presence and absence of CP. Though treatment with the RNA
oligomer resulted in the greatest degree of telomerase inhibition, both the DNA
oligonucleotides and 2-O-(methyl) RNA oligomer significantly decreased cell
viability when combined with CP in CP-resistant cells. Increased CP-sensitivity
associated with telomerase inhibition was related to increased caspase
3-dependent apoptosis. Therefore, cisplatin sensitivity can be enhanced in
ovarian cancer cells by concomitant treatment with a telomerase inhibitor. This suggests that telomerase inhibitors
may have clinical utility as chemo-sensitizing agents in patients with
platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Telomerase is a multimeric ribonucleoprotein that adds
telomeric repeats to chromosome ends (Morin, 1989). Thus, it stabilizes chromosomal DNA and
is thought to confer immortality to cells (Shay and Bacchetti, 1999). Telomerase activity is generally limited
to stem cell populations and tumor cells and is suppressed in normal somatic
cells (Kim et al, 1994). Telomerase consists of a RNA component (hTR) that
serves as an internal telomeric template, telomerase associated proteins and
hTERT, a reverse transcriptase (Kim et al 1994; Weinrich et al, 1997). While
both the protein catalytic hTERT subunit and the hTR RNA component have been
identified and cloned, reports suggest that the reverse transcriptase catalytic
subunit is the limiting determinant of telomerase activity (Feng et al, 1995;
Meyerson et al, 1997; Weinrich et al, 1997; Counter et al, 1998). We have
previously shown that a number of exogenous stresses can enhance telomerase
activity in ovarian cancer cells as well as activate de novo telomerase activity in non-malignant ovarian surface
epithelial cells (Alfonso-De Matte et al, 2001). Further, stress-induced
telomerase activity is regulated in a phosphatidylinositol triphosphate
kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-dependent manner (Alfsono-De Matte
et al, 2001, 2002a,b, 2004).
Over 90% of tumors examined to date, including ovarian
cancers, express telomerase activity (Hastie et al, 1990; Counter et al, 1994;
Kyo et al, 1996, 1998a,b; Summerfeld et al, 1996; Hoos et al, 1998). In the
ovary, studies have shown an absence of telomerase activity in normal ovarian
surface epithelium and pre-malignant lesions, while tumor cells from both
acites fluid and ovarian carcinomas express telomerase activity (Counter et al,
1994; Kyo et al, 1996, 1999; Murakami et al, 1997, 1998a,b; Duggan et al, 1998;
Datar et al, 1999; Oishi et al, 1999; Park et al, 1999). Telomerase activity
has been directly linked to ovarian tumor stage and aggressiveness (Murakami et
al, 1998a,b; Hahn et al, 1999; Yan et al, 1999).
While the primary function of telomerase is the
maintenance of telomeric integrity, several recent reports suggest an
association between telomerase with reduced apoptosis and increased
chemotherapeutic resistance (Asai et
al, 1998; Kondo et al, 1998a,b; Herbert et al, 1999; Tian et al, 1999; Zhang et
al 1999; Kiyozuka et al, 2000; Villa et al, 2000). Iida et al, (2000) showed
that telomerase activity was significantly higher in colorectal cancers
concurrently expressing the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2. A similar
relationship was demonstrated in cervical and colorectal cancer cell lines
(Mandal et al, 1997). Likewise, reduced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells
after exposure to etoposide was associated with elevated telomerase activity
(Sato et al, 2000). Lastly, recent reports suggested that hTERT suppressed
apoptosis prior to mitochondrial dysfunction and caspase activation in cultured
cells (Holt et al, 1999; Fu et al, 2000).
Although there have been very few similar studies in
the ovary, Faraoni et al, (1999) showed that telomerase activity in primary
cultures of ovarian cancer cells was inversely related to chemosensitivity. In
a pilot study, Takahashi et al, (2000) showed that ovarian cancer patients
responding to platinum therapy had low levels of telomerase whereas 50% of
non-responders demonstrated elevated telomerase activity.
Given its clinical importance, telomerase has been
investigated as a potential diagnostic or prognostic tool and especially as a
therapeutic target (Murakami et al, 1998b; Hahn et al, 1999; Yan et al, 1999).
Telomerase inhibitors include both synthetic and naturally occurring compounds
(Naasani et al, 1998; Perry et al, 1998; Togashi et al, 1998; Lian et al, 2001;
Lin et al, 2003; Kraveka et al, 2003; Yokoyama et al, 2004) and fall into two
general categories. The first involves compounds that bind telomeric DNA,
preventing telomerase access to the telomere and predominately include small
linear molecules that intercalate the G-quadruplex telomeric structure (Perry
et al, 1998; Gavathiotis et al, 2003; Shammas et al, 2003, 2004; Yin et al,
2003). This group of inhibitors also includes modified oligonucleotides with
sequence homology to telomeric DNA (Gavathiotis et al, 2003; Mata et al, 1997).
The second group of telomerase inhibitors abrogate the enzymatic function of
telomerase. These include reverse transcriptase inhibitors, most notably AZT
(Kitagawa et al, 2000; Brown et al, 2003; Yamahuchi et al, 2003), RNA
interference directed towards the hTERT catalytic component (Kosciolek et al,
2003), expression of dominant-negative hTERT mutants (Delhommeau et al, 2002),
peptide nucleic acids (Herbert et al, 1999), as well as anti-sense or modified
oligonucleotides complementary to the telomerase hTR RNA template (Kushner et
al, 2000). Accessibility and easy design of oligonucleotides makes hTR an ideal
target for telomerase inhibition. In addition, oligonucleotide modification,
often with oligomer methylation or phosphorothioate linkages between bases
(Levin, 1999; Chen et al, 2003), enhances oligomer stability from nuclease
digestion to dramatically increase oligomer half-life (Geary et al, 2001).
To date, there have been many promising and favorable
reports regarding anti-telomerase chemotherapeutic strategies. Anti-sense
inhibition of telomerase increased the susceptibility of glioblastoma cells to
cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Kondo et al, 1998a). Inhibition of telomerase with
oligonucleotides resulted in enhanced pheochromocytoma cell apoptosis (Fu et
al, 1999). Hahn et al, (1999) showed that complete inhibition of telomerase
activity using a mutant form of human telomerase resulted in the death of tumor
cells and in vivo expression of
mutant telomerase eliminated tumorigenicity.
Clearly, chemosensitivity is a crucial prognostic factor for ovarian cancer and levels of or changes in telomerase may predict therapeutic outcome. Because of the presence of telomerase in ovarian tumor cells and the propensity for therapeutic failure from the development of drug resistance, we sought to determine whether inhibition of telomerase improved sensitivity to cisplatin in vitro in ovarian cancer cell lines OV2008 and C13, parent and daughter, CP-sensitive and CP-resistant cell lines, respectively (Asselin et al, 2001). Two telomerase inhibitors were chosen, a hexameric phosphorothioate oligonucleotide with sequence homology identical to the repeat sequence of the mammalian telomere, 5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ (Mata et al, 1997) and a 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA oligomer complementary to the telomerase hTR RNA component (Pitts and Corey, 1998, Herbert et al, 1999). In the present study, we show that inhibition of telomerase activity dramatically improved sensitivity to cisplatin in CP-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
Two ovarian cancer cell
lines, OV2008 and C13 were used. The cell lines were selected because OV2008 is
CP sensitive and its daughter cell line, C13 is resistant to CP (Asselin et al,
2001). Cells were maintained in medium 199/MDCB 105 (1:1) (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), and 10 mg/ml gentamicin (GIBCO BRL,
Grand Island, NY) in a humidified 5% CO2/ 95% air atmosphere. Cell counts were performed using a
hemocytometer and cellular viability determined by Trypan blue exclusion assay.
Cell growth was determined by
the MTS colorimetric assay (Promega, Madison, WI). The assay was performed in
96 well microtiter plates according to manufacturerÕs instructions and is based
on soluble formazan production by dehydrogenase enzymes found in metabolically
active cells. Samples were seeded
six at 5x103 cells per well.
Absorbance was determined at 490nm using a Dynex MRX plate reader (Dynex
Technologies, Chantilly, VA).
To quantitatively detect changes in telomerase levels, cells were assayed for telomerase activity using the telomerase polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturerÕs directions and as performed previously (Alfonso-De Matte et al, 2001). This assay has been demonstrated to be as sensitive as the radioactive, telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay. Briefly, cells were washed with DulbeccoÕs phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), lysed in CHAPS lysis buffer and then assayed for protein using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturerÕs instructions. C13 and OV2008 cell extracts equivalent to 3 mg of protein were used. Following PCR-ELISA, telomerase activity was detected using a Dynex-MRX plate reader and recorded as absorbance units.
To examine the contribution
of transcriptional control for telomerase activity in OV2008 and C13 cells,
cells were incubated ± 5 mg/ml Actinomycin D and RT-PCR for hTERT mRNA was performed as described
previously (Alfonso-De Matte et al, 2001). Total RNA was collected using Trizol
reagent (GIBCO BRL). One microgram total RNA, oligo(dT) and reverse
transcriptase were used to generate single-stranded cDNA. The cDNA samples were
amplified using the Perkin-Elymer GeneAmp kit (Palo Alto, CA). b-actin was used as an internal control. The amplified products were
separated by electrophoresis on a 9% polyacrylamide gel, stained with 1X
SyberGreen (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, MD) and analyzed with the Kodak EDAS 120
Digital Analysis System. Net hTERT mRNA intensities were normalized to their
corresponding b-actin mRNA levels
and expressed as a percentage of b-actin mRNA
expression.
To examine the effect of
interfering with telomerase activity on drug sensitivity, exponentially growing
cells were treated with phosphorothioate DNA oligonucleotides (ODNs)
complementary to the human telomeric repeat sequence or composed of a scramble
sequence (Oncogene, Boston, MA) as described previously (Mata et al, 1997) at
2.5 mM in serum free media for 24
hours. Parallel cultures were also treated with 25 mM CP for two hours
after incubation with the ODNs. Cells were then collected and assayed for
telomerase activity, cell growth and caspase 3 levels at various time intervals
up to 72 hours. Controls were untreated cells in serum free media.
To examine the effect of telomerase inhibition using the 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA oligomer targeting the hTR template (Oncogene, Boston, MA) on CP sensitivity, cells were plated at 7.5x104 cells per 60 mm2 dish in serum free media for 24 hours. C13 cells were transfected with 34 ml Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), and 8 ml RNA [100nMol dissolved in 469 ml MW 4691.8]. OV2008 cells were transfected in the same manner except 17 ml Lipofectamine was used after optimization with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) cDNA to establish transfection conditions favoring the most oligomer uptake. In all transfection experiments, parallel cultures transfected with GFP were used as a control for transfection efficiency. After 24 hours the transfection media was removed ± 25 mM CP was added for 2 hours followed by serum containing media. Cells were then collected and assayed for telomerase activity, cell viability and levels of DNA fragmentation factor 45 (DFF45) at various time intervals up to 72 hours.
In order to determine the
extent to which apoptosis was affected by telomerase inhibition, cell lysates
were assayed for DFF45 cleavage or caspase-3 activation. Fifteen micrograms of
protein were added to 4x loading buffer (250 mM Tris pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 20%
glycerol, 0.012% bromophenol blue, 4% b-mercaptoethanol), heated to
95 ¡C for 5 minutes, electrophoresed in 12.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham,
Piscataway, NJ) via semi-dry transfer. Membranes were blocked with 3% nonfat
milk in DPBS or 5% nonfat milk in Tris buffered saline plus 0.1% Tween-20 for
DFF45 and caspase 3, respectively. All membranes were incubated overnight at 4¡C in primary antibody.
Polyclonal antibodies for
caspase-3 and DFF45 were purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA) and
BD-PharMingen (San Diego, CA), respectively. Membranes were incubated and
developed according to the Enhanced Chemiluminescent Protocol, according to
manufacturerÕs instructions (Amersham). After initial blotting, membranes were
reprobed for actin to ensure even loading.
Immunoblots were scanned and analyzed with ImagQuant software. Values reported for target proteins were normalized to the immunoblotsÕ respective actin levels.
Samples for telomerase
activity, MTS and trypan blue viability counts were run at least in triplicate
and the data subjected to Student t test analysis for determination of
statistical significance for telomerase activity or inhibition between treated
and untreated samples. The results were expressed as mean ± standard error.
A. Telomerase activity is increased in C13
cells.
In
contrast to primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells (MF10
and XD cells) that are telomerase negative (Kruk et al, 1999), both OV2008 and
C13 ovarian cancer cells expressed telomerase activity (Figure 1A). However, telomerase activity in the CP-sensitive OV2008
cells was consistently lower by approximately 25% than in C13 cells. RT-PCR
analysis revealed at least three times more of the 145-bp hTERT RNA product in
C13 cells compared with OV2008 cells when normalized to their respective 98-bp b-actin product (Figure
1B) confirming increased telomerase in C13 cells. In addition, hTERT mRNA
stability was at least 2.5-fold greater in C13 cells compared to OV2008 cells
with 40%

Figure 1.
Enhanced telomerase expression in CP-resistant ovarian cancer cells. (A) Telomerase activity was
determined by PCR-ELISA from lysates of C13 and OV2008 ovarian cancer cells as
well as from lysates of primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial
cells (MF10 and XD). Results are expressed as the average absorbance at 450nm ± SE. (B) C13 (grey bars) and OV2008 (open bars) cells were treated with
5 mg/ml Actinomycin D for 2 hours. The 145-bp hTERT
product seen following RT-PCR and PAGE was normalized to the respective 98-bp b-actin product.
loss of transcript in OV2008 cells compared
to 15% transcript loss in C13 cells following incubation with Actinomycin D (Figure 1B).
B. Telomerase activity is inhibited by
2Õ-OÕmethyl-RNA, but not by 5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ
OV2008 and C13 cell lines were assayed for telomerase
activity by PCR-ELISA after treatment with 5Õd(TTAGG)-3Õ ODN or 2Õ-OÕmethyl-RNA
oligomers. As expected, telomerase activity was not significantly lower at 24
(p<0.8) or 48 hours (p<0.67) in OV2008 cells when treated
with the 5Õd(TTAGG)-3Õ (T) ODN alone (Figure
2A) since 5Õd(TTAGG)-3Õ blocks access of telomerase to the telomere and
does not directly inhibit telomerase activity, but contributes to increased
telomeric instability. Similarly, the negative control antisense scramble oligonucleotide
(TN) did not cause a significant change in telomerase activity (Figure 2A). While a 2 hour treatment
with CP did not immediately affect telomerase activity, a 46% decrease in
telomerase activity was observed 48 hours after the 2 hour CP exposure in
OV2008 cells regardless of ODN treatment (*p<0.02 and **p<0.01
when compared to controls or to 5Õd(TTAGG)-3Õ alone). This reduction in
telomerase activity appeared to correlate with increased cell mortality as
determined by morphologic examination. Likewise, ODNs did not cause a
significant decrease in the telomerase activity in C13 cells (Figure 2B). Further, CP failed to have
any significant effect telomerase activity in these cells.
Cells were transfected with 2Õ-O-methyl-RNA after
optimization with GFP. Transfection efficiency was 70% in C13 cells and 50% in
OV2008. There was no significant change in telomerase activity in OV2008 cells
by 24 hours, however, telomerase activity was reduced by 40% at 48 hours
following transfection (Figure 2C)
(*p£0.04 and **p£0.02 2Õ-O-methyl-RNA or 2Õ-O-methyl-RNA + CP compared to controls,
respectively). In contrast, in the faster growing C13 cells, telomerase
activity was reduced by up to 90% at 24 hours following transfection with
2Õ-O-methyl-RNA ± CP (*p<0.004
and **p<0.005 compared to control values, respectively) (Figure 2D). However, telomerase
inhibition appeared to be reversible in C13 cells as demonstrated by the
restoration to baseline telomerase activity at 48 hours following transfection.
In order to determine the effect of
5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ-mediated telomerase inhibition on ovarian cancer cell growth,
MTS assays were performed. We noted that OV2008 cells grew slower than the C13
cells with an average doubling time approximately half that of C13 cells.
Though 5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ (T) and its scramble negative control oligomer (TN) had
no effect on CP-sensitive OV2008 cell growth, CP, in the absence or presence of
either T or TN ODNs, abrogated all cell growth and reduced cell numbers to well
below starting values (*p£ 0.0005) as would be
expected of CP-sensitive ovarian cancer cells (Figure 3A). ODNs or CP treatments alone also had little effect on
C13 cell growth, reducing cellular proliferation less than 20% (*p£ 0.001) (Figure
3B). However, combined treatment of 5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ with CP completely
abolished C13 cell growth, indicating that such a combined treatment improved
sensitivity to CP (**p£ 0.00004 and ***p£ 0.0003 compared to controls and CP-treated cells) (Figure 3B).
To
determine the role of apoptosis for improved chemosensitivity by 5Õ-d(TTAGG)3Õ,
cell lysates were assayed for cleaved caspase-3 using SDS-PAGE and western
immunoblot. The levels of active caspase 3 among controls, samples collected
immediately after a 2 hr treatment with 25 mM CP or 5Õ-d(TTAGG)3Õ oligomer-treated samples were negligible in both
OV2008 and C13 cells (Figure 3C,D).
However, densitometric analysis revealed at least an 85x and 44x increase of
caspase 3 activity in OV2008 and C13 samples, respectively, collected 48 hours
after treatment with both 5Õ-

Figure 2.
2Õ-O-(methyl)RNA oligomers inhibit telomerase activity in OV2008 and C13 cells. Telomerase activity was
determined from triplicate samples of OV2008 (A, C) and C13 (B, D)
cells following treatment with ODNs (A,
B) or transfection with 2Õ-O-(methyl)RNA (C,D). A, B) Cells were
treated with 5Õ-d(TTAGG)3Õ (T) or a scramble sequence (TN) ODN. Parallel
cultures were treated for 2 hours with 25 mM CP after which time the
medium was refreshed and the cultures maintained for up to 48 hours while
controls were untreated samples. (C, D) Cells
were transfected with 2Õ-O-(methyl)RNA (T) and similarly treated ± CP as in (A, B). Controls consisted of untreated
samples collected at 24 hours. Results are expressed as fold increase or
decrease in telomerase activity compared to control samples ± SE.
d(TTAGG)3Õ and 2 hours CP (Figure 3C,D).
Trypan blue exclusion
cell counts were used to determine the number viable, adherent cells after
transfection with 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA (Figure 4 A,B). In agreement with our results presented above,
sensitivity to CP in OV2008 cells was apparent. Treatment of OV2008 cells with
CP for 2 hours, with or without 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA, caused a 99%
decrease in the number of living cells by 72 hours following treatment (*p£ 0.001) (Figure 4 A). 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA
alone did not affect OV2008 cell viability (Figure 4 A).
As expected, C13 cells were only modestly sensitive to
CP with only a 34% decrease in adherent living cells by 72 hours when treated
with CP alone (*p£ 0.05) (Figure 4B). Similarly,
2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA did not significantly affect the number of viable C13
cells (Figure 4B). However, the
combined treatment of CP and 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA caused a 61% reduction
in adherent, living cells as compared to the control group (**p£ 0.006) and further increased CP-mediated cytotoxicity
by an additional 40% (***p£
0.04) (Figure 4B).
To determine whether telomerase inhibition by
2Õ-0-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA also enhanced apoptosis, SDS-PAGE was performed on
cell lysates and western immunoblots were probed for DFF45, a known cleavage
substrate of caspase-3 (Widlak, 2000). While treatment with
2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA alone did not affect DFF45 expression in either
OV2008 or C13 cells, combined treatment of 2Õ-O-(2-methoxyethyl) RNA with CP
greatly enhanced DFF45 degradation (Figure
4C,D). Densitometric analysis revealed approximately 2x and 3x increased
DFF45 cleavage in OV2008 and C13 cells, respectively, when CP was combined with
RNA treatment.

Figure 3.
5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ enhances CP-mediated cytotoxicity and caspase 3 activation in
C13 cells. Cell growth was measured by MTS assays
and expressed as average absorbance at 490 nm ± SE in OV2008 (A) and C13 (B) cells after treatment with 5Õ-d(TTAGG)-3Õ (T) or the scrambled
negative control (TN) ± 2 hour treatment with CP
while controls consisted of untreated samples. Parallel cultures of OV2008 (C) and C13 (D) cells were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Following transfer, blots
were probed for (active) cleaved caspase-3 (17-20kDa). Actin served as a
loading control.

Figure 4. 2Õ-O-(methyl) RNA enhances
CP-mediated cytotoxicity and DFF45 cleavage in C13. Cell viability was
determined by trypan blue exclusion counts and expressed as the number of cells
x 104 ± SE in OV2008 (A)
and C13 (B) cells after transfection
with the 2Õ-O-(methyl) RNA inhibitor (I) ± 2 hour treatment with CP
while controls consisted of untreated samples. Parallel cultures of OV2008 (C) and C13 (D) cells were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Following transfer, blots were
probed for the caspase 3 cleavage substrate, DFF45. Actin served as a loading
control.
Since telomerase is expressed in >90% of human
tumors and absent from most normal somatic cells and its expression correlates
with tumor aggressiveness, telomerase is an attractive target for therapeutic
intervention. Telomerase inhibition has been successfully achieved by several
mechanisms including antisense technology, ribozymes directed against
telomerase, and G-quadruplex binding agents that focus on either preventing
access of telomerase to telomeric ends or abrogating hTERT and/or hTR sites
(Rowley and Tabler, 2000). Inhibiting the addition of telomeric repeats to
chromosome ends does not necessarily cause immediate cell death and can require
substantial time to induce telomeric instability with subsequent growth arrest
because the rate of telomeric erosion is approximately 50-100 bases per cell
population doubling (Hastie et al, 1990; Shay, 1995; Shammas et al, 2004). In
contrast, inhibition of telomerase by directly abrogating hTERT or hTR function
may disrupt telomerase associated anti-apoptotic properties as well as promote
telomeric instability. Nonetheless, disruption of telomerase activity appears
to increase sensitivity to DNA damaging chemotherapeutic agents in breast
cancer cells (Ludwig et al, 2001), glioblastoma cells (Kondo et al, 1998), and
in neoplastic cells derived from telomerase RNA null mice (Lee et al, 2001). In
agreement, we found that platinum resistance in C13 ovarian cancer cells was
associated with increased telomerase activity that could contribute to enhanced
cancer cell survival. In contrast, prior to the development of drug resistance,
CP is an extremely effective chemothapeutic agent as demonstrated by the
exceptional cytotoxic capacity of CP for OV2008 cells. Therefore, since
chemoresistance, especially to platinum agents, is well documented in ovarian
cancer and presents a serious therapeutic challenge, we sought to improve
chemotherapeutic response in CP-resistant ovarian cancer cells by employing
telomerase inhibition as a novel adjuvant therapy.
5Õ-d(TTAGG)3Õ has been shown to inhibit telomerase
activity in cell lysates, lengthen cell doubling time and induce apoptosis in
Burkitts lymphoma cells (Mata et al, 1997). In the present study, 5Õ-d(TTAGG)3Õ
did not significantly lower the telomerase activity though it did dramatically
improve chemosensitivity to CP in C13 cells. A scrambled negative control did
not affect telomerase activity or improve sensitivity to CP though partial
activity of the nonsense negative controls was described in Mata et al, (1997).
While Lee et al, (2001) suggested that telomere dysfunction rather than
telomerase itself is the principle determinant governing chemosensitivity,
unlike previous studies, we did not see changes in MTL likely because of the
short time frame of our experiments.
2-O-methyl RNA was an effective inhibitor of
telomerase in both OV2008 and C13 cells. This inhibitor has already been
characterized in animal and early human clinical trials (Pitts and Corey,
1998). Our investigation demonstrated a significant reduction in cell viability
in cisplatin resistant cells when treated with both the 2-O-methyl RNA and
cisplatin.
In the classical model of telomerase activity,
inhibition of the enzyme alone would require multiple cell doublings to cause
significant telomere shortening to signal cell death. Our investigation, as
well as others (Kondo et al, 1998; Fu et al, 1999, Kushner et al, 2000),
suggests that it is unlikely that telomerase inhibition-mediated cell death is
related to telomere erosion alone although telomeric and, hence, chromosomal distortions
due to inhibition of telomerase function could signal DNA damage responses,
including increased apoptosis. Our results support an anti-apoptotic
contribution by telomerase, since inhibition of telomerase resulted in
increased caspase 3-dependent apoptosis. This is in agreement with studies
reporting an association between telomerase activity and enhanced cancer cell
survival consistent with poor prognosis in colon, breast, gastric, cervical,
uterine and lymphoid cancers (Asai et al, 1998; Kiyozuka et al, 2000; Villa et
al, 2000) in which telomerase appears to mediate its protective effect by
conferring resistance to apoptosis (Herbert et al, 1999; Iida et al, 2000;
Kondo et al, 1998a; Mandel and Kumar, 1997; Tian et al, 1999; Zhang et al,
1999).
Oligonucleotides as telomerase inhibitors have many
benefits. These oligonucleotides are commercially available or can be readily
synthesized which makes them attractive experimental agents. They bind the hTR
template and prevent the addition of telomeric repeats and mismatch negative
controls can be used to delineate proof of the mechanism of inhibition. There
are methods for large-scale oligo synthesis, their pharmacokinetic properties
are well characterized and the toxicity is low (Geary et al, 2001). There are
also indications that adequate oral bioavailability can be achieved (Khatsenko
et al, 2000). However, telomerase as a therapeutic target still raises many
questions since not all tumors exhibit telomerase activity (Shay, 1995).
Further, some normal cells, such as germ cells and hematopoietic cells, express
low levels of telomerase activity and an effective inhibitor may impair the
function of these cells (Morin, 1995). Subsequently, telomere loss resulting
from prolonged telomerase inhibition in normal cells could result in
chromosomal instability that can promote mutations required for cellular
transformation (de Lange and Jacks, 1999).
Nevertheless, our results
are promising in that both telomerase inhibitors employed significantly
increased CP-mediated cytotoxicity in CP-resistant ovarian cancer cells,
possibly in a caspase 3-dependent manner. The possibility of improving the
sensitivity of such cells to current chemotherapeutic treatments is exciting
and, clearly, warrants further study as an effective adjuvant treatment for
recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancer. Therefore, by understanding the
relationship between telomerase activity and apoptotic pathways in ovarian
tumor progression, abrogation of telomerase in conjunction with conventional
platinum regimes could improve current therapeutic efficacy and clinical
outcome by increasing cellular sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents.
We thank Dr. Nicole C. Johnson and Ms. Yira Bermudez
for help with densitometric analysis. This work was supported, in part, by a
United States Army Department of Defense New Investigator Award DAMD
17-00-1-0565 (P.A.K.).
Zhang X, Mar V, Zhou W, Harrington L, and Robinson
MO (1999) Telomere shortening and
apoptosis in telomerase-inhibited human tumor cells. Genes Dev. 13, 2388-2399.

Patricia
A. Kruk