Cancer Therapy Vol 2, 519-524, 2004
Skull base chondrosarcoma
William M. Mendenhall1,*, Stephen B. Lewis2,
Douglas B. Villaret3, and Nancy P. Mendenhall1
1Radiation
Oncology Department
2Neurosurgery
Department
3Otolaryngology
Department, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: William
M. Mendenhall, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida
Health Science Center, P.O. Box 100385, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385; Telephone:
(352) 265-0287; Fax: (352) 265-0759; e-mail: mendewil@shands.ufl.edu
Key words: Chondrosarcomas,
Base of skull, Radiotherapy, Proton radiotherapy, Treatment outcomes
Abbreviations:
American Joint Committee on Cancer, (AJCC); cobalt gray equivalents, (CGE);
Computed tomography, (CT); epithelial membrane antigen, (EMA); loss of
heterozygosity, (LOH); magnetic resonance imaging, (MRI); radiotherapy, (RT);
retinoblastoma, (Rb)
Summary
The purpose
of this paper is to discuss the natural history, optimal treatment, and
outcomes for skull base chondrosarcomas. The pertinent literature was reviewed.
The majority of skull base chondrosarcomas are low grade and exhibit an
indolent growth pattern. A small subset of patients present with mesenchymal or
dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas and have a poor prognosis. Although extensive
skull base resections may result in long disease-free survival, the likelihood
of a complete resection with negative margins is low, and the permanent
morbidity of these operations is significant. Proton radiotherapy after subtotal
resection or biopsy results in a high rate of cure with a relatively low
probability of late complications. The preferred treatment for skull base
chondrosarcomas is proton radiotherapy alone or combined with less aggressive
surgical procedures.
I. Introduction
Chondrosarcoma is a
relatively rare tumor that may arise in any bone that is preformed by cartilage
(Brown et al, 1994). It accounts for 11% to 19% of all primary bone tumors and
may arise de novo or in preexisting conditions including PagetŐs disease,
enchondromas, osteo-cartilaginous exostoses, OllierŐs disease, and
osteochondromas (Brown et al, 1994). Skull base chondrosarcomas usually arise de novo and account for
approximately 0.15% of all intracranial tumors (Brown et al, 1994; Crockard et
al, 2001). Approximately 75% of chondrosarcomas occur in the trunk, femur, or
humerus, 5% to 12% arise in the head and neck, and roughly 1% are found in the
skull base (Brown et al, 1994). The majority of skull base chondrosarcomas arise
in synchondroses near the temporooccipital junction (Rosenberg et al, 1999;
Raghu et al, 2004). Rosenberg et al, (1999) reported on 200 patients treated at
the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston) for skull base chondrosarcomas and
observed the following site distribution: temporooccipital, 66%; clivus, 28%;
and sphenoethmoid complex, 6%.
Skull base
chondrosarcomas exhibit a roughly equal gender distribution and a wide age
range. (Korten et al, 1998; Hug et al, 1999; Rosenberg et al, 1999). Rosenberg
et al, (1999) observed a 1:1.3 male to female ratio and an age range of 10 to
79 years (mean, 39 years). Korten et al, (1998) reported on 15 patients with
skull base chondrosarcomas treated in the Netherlands, and 177 patients
reported in the literature and observed a 1:1.1 male to female ratio and an age
range of 3 months to 76 years (mean, 37 years).
Patients often present
with cranial nerve deficits (usually the abducens nerve), headaches, and
symptoms related to temporal bone invasion (Volpe et al, 1993; Korten et al,
1998; Crockard et al, 2001; Raghu et al, 2004). Korten et al, (1998) reported
the following presenting symptoms: oculomotor dysfunction, 51%; headaches, 31%;
and diminished hearing, dizziness, and tinnitus, 21%. Volpe et al, (1993) evaluated
the neuroophthalmologic findings in 48 patients with skull base chordomas and
49 patients with skull base chondrosarcomas and observed abnormal visual
examinations in 67% and 94%, respectively.
The duration of symptoms before presentation is variable. Korten et al,
(1998) observed a range of 1 month to 12 years (mean, 27 months; median, 15
months).
II. Pathology
Chondrosarcomas may be
stratified as conventional, mesenchymal, and dedifferentiated and are graded
based on cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic activity (Brown et al,
1994). In contrast to conventional chondrosarcomas, mesenchymal, and
dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas exhibit aggressive behavior and portend a poor
prognosis (Brown et al, 1994).
Conventional
chondrosarcomas are composed of round or oval cartilaginous cells with single
or multiple nuclei and may contain myxoid changes, calcifications, and/or
ossification (Brown et al, 1994; Rosenberg et al, 1999). Mesenchymal
chondrosarcomas are composed of islands of cartilage and sheets of
undifferentiated small stromal cells with hyperchromatic nuclei (Brown et al,
1994). Differentiated chondrosarcomas exhibit anaplastic foci within a
low-grade cartilaginous matrix (Brown et al, 1994).
Korten et al, (1998)
observed the following histologic distribution: grade 1, 51%; grade 2, 11%;
mesenchymal, 30%; and myxoid, 8%. The following grade distribution was reported
by Rosenberg et al, (1999) in 200 patients with conventional chondrosarcomas:
grade 1, 50.5%; mixed grade 1 and grade 2, 28.5%; and grade 2, 21%.
Chondrosarcomas must be
distinguished from chondroid chordomas that tend to behave more aggressively
and have a worse prognosis. Rosenberg et al, (1999) observed that 96 of 97
chondrosarcomas (99%) stained positively for S–100; none exhibited
keratin positivity. Seven of 88 patients (8%) stained faintly for epithelial
membrane antigen (EMA) (Rosenberg et al, 1999). Ishida and Dorfman, (1994)
analyzed 9 patients with skull base chondrosarcomas and 7 patients with skull
base chondroid chordomas and found that chondrosarcomas did not stain for
cytokeratin or EMA, whereas chondroid chordomas stained positively for both.
Eisenberg et al, (1997) analyzed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the
retinoblastoma (Rb) gene (a tumor suppressor gene found in a number of
malignancies) in 7 patients with skull base chordomas and 2 patients with skull
base chondrosarcomas. Two of 7 chordomas exhibited LOH compared with 0 of 2
chondrosarcomas; both chordomas with LOH behaved very aggressively (Eisenberg
et al, 1997).
III. Diagnostic evaluation
Computed tomography (CT)
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are employed to evaluate the primary
tumor; chest CT should be obtained in patients with poorly differentiated
tumors.
CT generally demonstrates
a lytic lesion and is used to demonstrate the extent of bone invasion and tumor
mineralization (Brown et al, 1994; Crockard et al, 2001; Maleuz et al, 1996).
Contrast-enhanced CT often shows moderate enhancement (Maleuz et al, 1996).
MRI is useful to
demonstrate the soft tissue extent of the tumor. T1-weighted gadolinium DTPA enhanced MRI
shows a hyperintense mass in the portions of the tumor that are non-calcified;
the calcified part of the tumor exhibits a mixture of hypo- and hyperintensity
(Maleuz et al, 1996). T2-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI reveals a hyperintense
tumor with areas of inhomogeneity corresponding to the calcified portions of
the mass (Maleuz et al, 1996).
IV.
Staging
Patients are staged
according to the recommendations of the American Joint Committee on Cancer
(AJCC) (2002) staging system (Table 1).
Table 1. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, 2002
|
DEFINITION OF TNM |
||||||
|
Primary Tumor (T) |
|
|||||
|
TX |
Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
|||||
|
T0 |
No evidence of primary tumor |
|||||
|
T1 |
Tumor 8 cm or less in greatest dimension |
|||||
|
T2 |
Tumor more than 8 cm in the greatest dimension |
|||||
|
T3 |
Discontinuous tumors in the primary bone site |
|||||
|
Regional Lymph Nodes (N) |
|
|||||
|
NX |
Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed |
|||||
|
N0 |
No regional lymph node metastasis |
|||||
|
N1 |
Regional lymph node metastasis |
|||||
|
Distant Metastasis (M) |
|
|||||
|
MX |
Distant metastasis cannot be assessed |
|||||
|
M0 |
No distant metastasis |
|||||
|
M1 |
Distant metastasis |
|||||
|
M1a |
Lung |
|||||
|
M1b |
Other distant sites |
|||||
|
Stage Grouping |
|
|||||
|
Stage 1A |
T1 |
N0 |
M0 |
G1, 2 Low grade |
|
|
|
Stage 1B |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
G1, 2 Low grade |
|
|
|
Stage IIA |
T1 |
N0 |
M0 |
G3, 4 High grade |
|
|
|
Stage IIB |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
G3, 4 High grade |
|
|
|
Stage III |
T3 |
N0 |
M0 |
Any G |
|
|
|
Stage IVA |
Any T |
N0 |
M1a |
Any G |
|
|
|
Stage IVB |
Any T |
N1 |
Any M |
Any G |
|
|
|
|
Any T |
Any N |
M1b |
Any G |
|
|
|
Histologic Grade (G) |
|
|||||
|
GX |
Grade cannot be assessed |
|
||||
|
G1 |
Well differentiated - Low grade |
|
||||
|
G2 |
Moderately differentiated - Low grade |
|
||||
|
G3 |
Poorly differentiated - High grade |
|
||||
|
G4 |
Undifferentiated - High grade |
|
||||
V.
Treatment
The treatment of skull
base chondrosarcoma is controversial and varies from skull base resection alone
or combined with conventional radiotherapy (RT) or charged particle RT to less
aggressive operations combined with proton RT (Ruark et al, 1992; Stapleton et
al, 1993; Gay et al, 1995; Berson et al, 1988; Hug et al, 1999; Rosenberg et
al, 1999, Crockard et al, 2001). There are few data pertaining to the efficacy
of stereotactic radiosurgery (Muthukumar et al, 1998). It is difficult to
compare the outcomes of various treatment strategies because skull base
chondrosarcomas are uncommon, the majority are low grade and exhibit an
indolent growth pattern, and the outcomes data are sometimes combined with
those of chordomas which have a more unfavorable prognosis.
VI.
Local–regional control and survival
A. Surgery
Stapleton et al, (1993)
reported on 8 patients with skull base chondrosarcomas treated surgically at
Atkinson MorleyŐs Hospital (London) between 1985 and 1991. Two patients were
operated on after treatment failures from previous RT (1 patient) or surgery (1
patient). No patient received proton RT. One patient underwent an operation;
the remaining 7 patients underwent 2 operations (4 patients), 4 operations (2
patients), and 5 operations (1 patient), respectively. One patient received
postoperative RT. Three patients were alive and disease-free at 7, 9, and 10
years, respectively. One patient was alive with the disease at 4.8 years, 2
patients died with disease at 2 and 8 years, 1 patient was lost to follow-up at
1 year, and 1 patient died postoperatively after a fourth resection 3 years
after the first surgical procedure.
Crockard et al, (2001)
reported on 17 patients with low-grade (15 patients) or mesenchymal (2
patients) skull base chondrosarcomas treated surgically at St. BartholomewŐs
Hospital (London) between 1986 and 1998. Two patients had previous surgery, 3
patients had previous surgery and RT, and 2 patients had previous surgery and
chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from the time of tissue diagnosis,
leading to significant lead-time bias in the 7 previously treated patients. All
17 patients underwent resection; none of the resections resulted in complete
tumor removal. The 2 patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcomas died at 1.7 and
3 years, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate for the 15 patients
with low-grade chondrosarcomas was 93%. However, some of those patients were
previously treated and, as previously stated, the method of outcomes analysis
resulted in significant lead-time bias.
Gay et al, (1995)
reported on 60 patients with skull base chondrosarcomas (14 patients) and
chordomas (46 patients) treated surgically at the University of Pittsburgh (PA)
between 1984 and 1993. Thirty of 60 patients (50%) were previously treated.
Sixty-seven percent of the 60 patients had a total or near total resection and
20% received postoperative RT. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate for the
14 patients with chondrosarcomas was 90%.
Raghu et al, (2004)
reported on 3 patients with temporal bone chondrosarcomas treated with surgery
and postoperative RT at Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge, UK). All 3 patients
were alive and disease-free at 5, 6, and 8 years, respectively.
B. Radiotherapy
Berson et al, (1988)
reported on 13 patients with chondrosarcomas of the skull base or cervical
spine treated with subtotal resection and charged particle RT alone or combined
with photons at the University of California Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
between 1977 and 1986. The 5-year local control and survival rates were
approximately 77% and 72%, respectively. Three patients (23%) developed distant
metastases; all 3 had grade 2 chondrosarcomas. Castro and co-workers, (1994)
reported an update of their experience that included 27 patients with skull
base chondrosarcomas: the 5-year local control and survival rates were 78% and
83%, respectively.
Hug et al, (1999)
reported on 25 patients treated with proton RT at Loma Linda University Medical
Center (CA) between 1992 and 1998 for skull base chondrosarcomas. Two of 25
patients (8%) were previously treated, 9 patients (36%) had brainstem invasion,
and 21 patients (84%) had gross tumor present at the time of proton RT.
Twenty-three of 25 patients (92%) were locally controlled and remained
disease-free after treatment.
No‘l et al, (2003)
reported on 67 patients treated with proton RT for skull base or cervical spine
chondrosarcomas (18 patients) or chordomas (49 patients) between 1995 and 2000
at the Centre de ProtonthŽrapie dŐOrsay (Orsay, France). Median follow-up was
20 months. Two-thirds of the treatment was delivered with photons and one-third
with protons. Four of 18 patients with chondrosarcomas underwent gross total
resection, 11 had a subtotal resection, and 3 had a biopsy before proton RT.
Thirteen patients had no previous therapy and 5 patients were treated for
locally recurrent disease. The 3-year local control and survival rates after
proton RT were 85% and 75%, respectively.
Rosenberg et al, (1999)
reported on 200 patients with grade 1 and 2 skull base chondrosarcomas treated
at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Cyclotron (Boston, MA)
between 1978 and 1997. Five percent of patients had a gross total resection,
74% had a subtotal resection, and 21% had a partial resection or biopsy before
proton RT. Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 18.5 years (mean, 65 months).
Patients received a median dose of 72.1 cobalt gray equivalents (CGE) in 38
fractions (range, 64.2 to 79.6 CGE). The 10-year local control and
cause-specific survival rates were 98% and 99%, respectively. No patient
experienced hematogenous dissemination. Austin et al, (1993) analyzed the cause
of failure in 3 patients treated with proton RT at the Massachusetts General
Hospital; two recurrences were marginal and likely due to low doses in regions
where the dose was constrained because of the risk of normal tissue toxicity,
and one recurrence was within the high-dose volume.
VII.
Complications
A. Surgery
Gay et al, (1995)
reported on 60 patients treated surgically at the University of Pittsburgh (PA)
for skull base chondrosarcomas (14 patients) and chordomas (46 patients).
Postoperative complications for the overall group of 60 patients included
cerebrospinal fluid leak, 18 patients (3%); meningitis, 6 patients (10%); brain
infarct, 2 patients (3%); and death, 2 patients (3%). Forty-eight patients
(80%) had a new cranial nerve deficit (usually the 6th cranial nerve)
after the operation, 15% had hearing loss (usually partial), 8% had 7th
cranial nerve paralysis or paresis, and 8% had visual loss or decline. Overall,
24 of 60 patients (40%) had a permanent functional decline after the operation,
usually 10 points on the Karnofsky performance scale.
Raghu et al, (2004)
reported on 3 patients treated with surgery and postoperative RT for temporal
bone chondrosarcomas; all 3 had cranial nerve injuries after the operation.
B. Radiotherapy
Hug et al, (1999)
reported on 58 patients treated with proton RT for skull base chondrosarcomas
(25 patients) and chordomas (33 patients); 3 patients (5%) experienced late
symptomatic complications including severe unilateral hearing loss (1 patient),
a single focal seizure (1 patient) and significant bilateral loss of hearing
and vision (1 patient).
No‘l et al, (2003)
reported on 67 patients treated with proton RT for skull base and cervical
spine chondrosarcomas (18 patients) and chordomas (49 patients). Sixteen
patients (24%) experienced total (14 patients) or partial (2 patients)
hypopituitarism, 12 patients (18%) had mild hearing loss, and 4 patients (6%)
experienced severe late complications including oculomotor impairment (2
patients), severe hearing loss (1 patient), and near complete bilateral visual
loss (1 patient).
VIII. Conclusion
Skull base chondrosarcoma is rare, usually low grade,
and exhibits an indolent growth pattern. Although patients can be treated with
aggressive resection, the probability of complete resection with negative
margins is low and the permanent morbidity of these procedures is often
significant. Charged particle RT (such as protons or carbon ions) alone or
combined with subtotal resection results in a high probability of cure and
relatively low risk of toxicity.
American Joint
Committee on Cancer (2002) Bone. In:
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC
Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer, 187-92
Austin JP,
Urie MM, Gardenosa G, Munzenrider JE (1993)
Probable causes of recurrence in patients with chordoma and chondrosarcoma of
the base of skull and cervical spine. Int
J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25, 439-44
Berson AM,
Castro JR, Petti P, Phillips TL, Gauger GE, Gutin P, Collier JM, Henderson SD,
Baken K (1988) Charged particle
irradiation of chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull and cervical
spine: The Lawrence Berkeley laboratory experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15, 559-65
Brown E, Hug
EB, Weber AL (1994) Chondrosarcoma
of the skull base. Neuroimaging Clin N
Am 4, 529-41
Castro JR,
Linstadt DE, Bahary JP, Petti PL, Daftari I, Collier JM, Gutin PH, Gauger G,
Phillips TL (1994) Experience in
charged particle irradiation of tumors of the skull base: 1977-1992. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29,
647-55.
Crockard HA,
Cheeseman A, Steel T, Revesz T, Holton JL, Plowman N, Singh A, Crossman J (2001) A multidisciplinary team approach
to skull base chondrosarcomas. J
Neurosurg 95, 184-9
Eisenberg MB,
Woloschak M, Sen C, Wolfe D (1997)
Loss of heterozygosity in the rhinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene in skull base
chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Surg Neurol
47, 156-61
Gay E, Sekhar
LN, Rubinstein E, Wright DC, Sen C, Janecka IP, Snyderman CH (1995) Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of
the cranial base: Results and follow-up of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 36, 887-97
Hug EB, Loredo
LN, Slater JD, DeVries A, Grove RI, Schaefer RA, Rosenberg AE, Slater JM (1999) Proton radiation therapy for
chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg 91, 432-9
Ishida T,
Dorfman HD (1994) Chondroid chordoma
versus low-grade chondrosarcoma of the base of the skull: Can
immunohistochemistry resolve the controversy? J Neuro-Oncol 18, 199-206
Korten AGGC,
ter Berg HJW, Spincemaille GH, van der Laan RT, Van de Wel AM (1998) Intracranial chondrosarcoma:
Review of the literature and report of 15 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65, 88-92
Maleux G,
Demaerel P, Vanslambrouck K, Aerts P, Brijs S, Tanghe W (1996) Chondrosarcoma of the skull base: CT, MR and pathological
features. ROFO (or Fortschr Rontgenstr) 165,
599-601
Muthukumar N,
Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC (1998)
Stereotactic radiosurgery for chordoma and chondrosarcoma: Further experiences.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41,
387-92
No‘l G,
Habrand JL, Jauffret E, de Crevoisier R, Dederke S, Mammar H, Haie-Meder C,
Pontvert D, Hasboun D, Ferrand R, Boisserie G, Beaudre A, Gaboriaud G, Guedea
F, Petriz L, Mazeron JJ (2003)
Radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and
cervical spine. Prognostic factors and patterns of failure. Strahlenther Onkol 179, 241-8
Raghu M,
Moumoulidis I, De R, Moffat D (2004)
Chondrosarcomas of the temporal bone: Presentation and management. J Laryngol Otol 118, 551-5
Rosenberg AE,
Nielsen GP, Keel SB, Renard LG, Fitzek MM, Munzenrider JE, Liebsch NJ (1999) Chondrosarcoma of the base of the
skull. A clinicopathologic study of 200 cases with emphasis on its distinction
from chordoma. Am J Surg Pathol 23,
1370-8
Ruark DS,
Schlehaider UK, Shah JP (1992)
Chondrosarcomas of the head and neck. World
J Surg 16, 1010-5
Stapleton SR,
Wilkins PR, Archer DJ, Uttley D (1993)
Chondrosarcoma of the skull base: A series of eight cases. Neurosurgery 32, 348-56
Volpe NJ,
Liebsch NJ, Munzenrider JE, Lessell S (1993)
Neuro-ophthalmologic findings in chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base.
Am J Ophthalmol 115, 97-104

William
M. Mendenhall