Cancer Therapy Vol 3, 65-76, 2005

 

Thalidomide and its use in renal and prostate cancer

Review Article

 

Simon Pridgeon1, Marcus Drake2,*

1Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 3DN, UK

2School of Surgical Sciences, The Medical School, University of Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK

__________________________________________________________________________________

*Correspondence: Marcus Drake, School of Surgical Sciences, 3rd Floor Wm Leech building, Medical School, University of Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK; Tel: +44 191 222 7157; Fax: +44 191 222 8514; E-mail: M.J.Drake@ncl.ac.uk

Key words: Prostate cancer, Pharmacology, Adverse drug effects, Tumour biology and angiogenesis, Renal cell carcinoma, Clinical trials

Abbreviations: androgen independent prostate cancer, (AIPC); cyclooxygenase-2, (COX-2); fibroblast growth factor, (FGF); Gene-directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy, (GDEPT); IkB kinase, (IkK); interferon-a2a, (IFN-a2a); interferon–a2b, (IFN-a2b); Prostatic Specific Antigen, (PSA); Renal cell carcinoma, (RCC); System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety, (S.T.E.P.S); vascular endothelial growth factor, (VEGF)

 

Received: 9 February 2005; Accepted: 11 February 2005; electronically published: February 2005

 

Summary

Thalidomide was marketed as a sedative and antiemetic in the 1950Õs, but it was withdrawn due to teratogenicity. It has since shown clinical benefit in certain benign diseases, and recently interest has focussed on its potential use in cancer management. It has anti-angiogenic properties, which are mediated by a variety of mechanisms including growth factor inhibition. First line management of advanced prostate cancer generally uses androgen ablation therapy. Progression and metastasis of prostate cancer following androgen ablation arises from growth factor-mediated mechanisms, in which angiogenesis is an important component. Clinical trials with thalidomide have shown partial response in a proportion of patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. These trials provide some insight into possible mechanisms of cancer progression, and support future research into the role of thalidomide as an adjunctive therapeutic agent. Progression of renal cell cancer is poorly understood. Management of metastatic disease is unsatisfactory, since the tumours show little response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, while systemic immunotherapy is effective in a minority of patients. Several clinical trials in renal cell cancer have employed thalidomide, but results have generally not suggested substantial benefit.

 


I. Introduction

Thalidomide was introduced in the 1950Õs as an over-the-counter sedative and subsequently an anti-emetic for the treatment of pregnancy-induced morning sickness. Reported association between thalidomide use and severe congenital abnormalities prompted its withdrawal in 1961. By this time about 12,000 children had been affected with birth defects, including dysmelia (stunted limb growth) and deformities of the heart, kidneys, eyes and spinal cord.

Thalidomide has re-emerged as a drug of scientific interest following recognition of its activity in reactive lepromatous leprosy (Sheskin, 1965). Thalidomide was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1998 as a treatment for the acute cutaneous manifestations of erythema nodosum leprosum and as maintenance therapy to prevent its recurrence. Thalidomide has since been shown to be effective in the treatment of other non-malignant diseases including mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, graft-versus-host disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, CrohnÕs disease and HIV-related cachexia. In addition, substantial interest surrounds the immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic properties of thalidomide in the treatment of malignant diseases. A number of studies have demonstrated it has significant activity in the treatment of multiple myeloma (Singhal et al, 1999; Rajkumar et al, 2002) as well as other haematological malignancies. This article reviews the mechanism of action of thalidomide and its potential use as an anti-cancer agent in the treatment of urological malignancies.

 

II. Pharmacology

Thalidomide –a- (N-phthalimido )glutarimide– contains a phthalimide ring and a glutarimide ring (Figure 1). The glutarimide ring has a chiral centre with dextrorotatory (R) and levorotatory (S) forms. The enantiomers have different biological properties; sedative effects are associated with the R-enantiomer, whereas immunological effects are more closely associated with the S-enantiomer. They readily interconvert at physiologic

Figure 1: The chemical structure of thalidomide

 

pH making total separation of their clinical effects unfeasible.

Thalidomide has poor solubility in both water and ethanol. Its poor aqueous solubility means that no intravenous preparation is available and enteral absorption of the drug is slow. The time to peak plasma levels following oral administration increases with increasing dose, ranging from 3 to 6 hours (Warren, 2001). Thalidomide undergoes rapid spontaneous non-enzymatic hydrolysis which is affected by both pH and temperature, generating at least 12 metabolites in humans. In vitro studies suggest thalidomide induces cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes in rats. However, in humans thalidomide does not inhibit or induce its own metabolism over a 21-day period, and thus very little metabolism of thalidomide is thought to occur via the hepatic cytochrome P-450 system (Tsambaos et al, 1994; Scheffler et al, 1999). The mean elimination half life in healthy individuals is 4.7 hours with an apparent mean clearance of 10 and 21 L/h for the R- and S- enantomers respectively. Both single and multiple dosing of thalidomide in older prostate cancer patients revealed a significantly longer half-life at a higher dose (1200 mg daily) than at a lower dose (200 mg daily) – 18.52h and 6.52h respectively (Figg et al, 1999). Metabolites of thalidomide are rapidly eliminated in urine, but little unchanged thalidomide is excreted this way.

 

III. Adverse drug effects

Thalidomide-associated peripheral neuropathy is generally characterized by painful symmetric paraesthesiae in the toes and feet; electrophysiologic findings suggest axonal degeneration without demyelination (Fullerton and O'Sullivan, 1968; Aronson et al, 1984; Clemmensen et al, 1984). Related symptoms include muscle cramps or weakness, signs of pyramidal tract involvement, and carpal tunnel syndrome. Improvement is usually observed with discontinuation of therapy; however, cases of irreversible or longstanding sensory loss have been reported. The incidence of neuropathy is increased in older patients and after administration of high cumulative doses. Molloy et al, (2001) investigated the incidence of thalidomide-induced neuropathy in a group of patients treated for metastatic prostate cancer. Seventy five percent of the patients who remained on treatment for 6 months or longer developed an axonal neuropathy. By nine months all three patients who continued the trial developed a neuropathy.

Further reported side effects of thalidomide include somnolence, nausea, dry mouth and skin, constipation, increased appetite, headache, hypertension, bradycardia, dizziness and orthostatic hypotension, altered temperature sensitivity, irregularities in menstrual cycles, hypothyroidism and peripheral oedema (Stirling, 2000). Constipation can be controlled with an aggressive laxative regimen. Somnolence, nausea, and skin rashes are dose-dependent and generally resolve with discontinuation of therapy. Thalidomide-induced sedation can be antagonized with the central nervous system stimulants methylphenidate and methylamphetamine (Somers, 1960) but this has not been evaluated in controlled trials. The impact of somnolence can be minimized by administration of the drug at bedtime.

The immunomodulatory action of thalidomide does not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of infections; evidence suggests that thalidomide does not directly suppress lymphocyte proliferation (Geitz et al, 1996) although inhibition of proliferation of already stimulated lymphocytes has been shown (Keenan et al, 1991).

Thalidomide is teratogenic when taken in early pregnancy (Nowack, 1965). The drug was found to be teratogenic only during days 34-50 after the last menstruation. To safeguard patients and prevent foetal exposure, the U.S. manufacturer of thalidomide developed a restricted prescribing and dispensing program called S.T.E.P.S. (System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety) (Warren, 2001). This program requires registration of doctors and pharmacists involved in the dispensing process as well as the provision of educational material. Women of child bearing age are instructed to use two forms of contraception and undergo pregnancy testing before and during a course of treatment. Males are required to abstain from sexual intercourse or use a condom during therapy and up to one month thereafter.

The optimal dosing strategy for thalidomide is uncertain, and is influenced by the biology of the disease being treated, the idiosyncratic nature of the adverse effects profile and the unpredictable gastrointestinal absorption. Most clinical trials for cancer have used doses from 100-1200 mg per day either as a single dose at night or in two divided doses. Intolerance of the side effect profile is an important factor in patient withdrawal from trials.

 

IV. Mechanisms of action

The anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties of thalidomide have been studied both in vitro and in vivo and are likely to be due to its ability to affect cytokine production and cell function. The understanding of the in vivo modes of action of thalidomide have been difficult to elucidate due to the spontaneous inter-conversion between S- and R-enantiomers, making total separation of their effects impossible. Thalidomide appears to undergo an as yet uncharacterised metabolic activation since its in vitro effects are modest when compared to its observed potency in vivo (Bauer et al, 1998; Stirling, 2000).

Initial clues as to thalidomideÕs role in angiogenesis came from observations by DÕAmato et al, who found that it inhibited neovascularisation induced by basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the rabbit cornea micropocket assay (D'Amato et al, 1994). Because this inhibition occurred only after oral administration of thalidomide it has been suggested that an active metabolite is formed in vivo (D'Amato et al, 1994; Bauer et al, 1998). Animal studies support the antiangiogenic effect of thalidomide since treatment has been shown to decrease vascular density in granulation tissue (Adeoti et al, 1998). The anti-angiogenic effects are thought to be clinically beneficial in diseases dependant on new vessel formation

Thalidomide decreases production of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-a) in monocytes and macrophages by accelerating degradation of TNF-a mRNA (Sampaio et al, 1991; Moreira et al, 1993). An alternative action is via binding to a1-acid glycoprotein, which is known to have anti- TNF-a activity (Keifer et al, 2001). In addition thalidomide decreases the binding activity of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB), an anti-apoptotic gene product involved in immune responses and cellular growth, which in turn controls the activation of the TNF-a gene (Turk et al, 1996). Anti TNF-a activity may play a role in thalidomide treatment of multiple myeloma. Increased pre-treatment TNF-a levels appear to predict progression- free survival after thalidomide. In addition DNA polymorphisms involving the TNF-a gene have been correlated with response to thalidomide treatment in myeloma (Thompson et al, 2003).

A role for the enzyme CYP2C19 has recently been reported for thalidomide metabolism. It is suggested that thalidomide undergoes hydroxylation under the influence of this enzyme (Ando et al, 2002). A mechanism has been proposed whereby CYP2C19 converts thalidomide to a bioactive form that interferes with NFkB activation. NFkB is usually bound to the inhibitory protein IkBa in the cytoplasm and dissociates from this complex following activation of the enzyme IkB kinase (IkK). NFkB is then free to translocate into the nucleus to activate genes which promote cellular proliferation, angiogenesis and inhibition of apoptosis (Figure 2). The hydroxylated metabolites of thalidomide reduce IkK activity through interleukin-1β (IL-1b) and TNF-a thereby inhibiting the release of free NFkB (Ando et al, 2002).

Pro-angiogenic factors other than TNF-a are altered by thalidomide. Thalidomide inhibits interleukin-6, a potent growth factor for malignant cells, and interleukin-12 production by monocytes (D'Amato et al, 1994).


 

Figure 2: Mechanisms of action of thalidomide. Metabolites formed from the oxidation of thalidomide by CYP2C19 inhibits TNF-a and/or IL-1b activation of IkK. This in turn prevents the dissociation of of IkK from the IkK-NFkB complex. NFkB usually enters the nucleus to induce genes that promote angiogenesis, cellular proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis as well as promoting further TNF-a transcription; this function of NFkB is thus inhibited by thalidomide and its metabolites. Thalidomide also promotes the degredation of TNF-a mRNAand interacts with a-1 acid glycoprotein to inhibit the actions of TNF-a function.

 


Further effects of thalidomide may be relevant to clinical management of malignancy. Inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis has been reported in an in vitro model (Faure et al, 1980). Thalidomide also inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis (Dunzendorfer et al, 1997). Leukocyte migration to sites of inflammation may be affected by downregulation of cellular adhesion molecules (Settles et al, 2001). Thalidomide has been reported to decrease the ratio of circulating T-helper cells to suppressor T cells in healthy subjects as the result of a reduction in the production of helper cells and increase in production of suppressor cells.

Another possible mode of action for thalidomide involves modulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a key enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins (Fujita et al, 2001). COX-2 is highly expressed in various human cancers including prostate cancer, and has been shown to be required for angiogenesis in a rat corneal model (Yamada et al, 1999; Daniel et al, 1999). The results are in keeping with the anti-angiogenic response of human prostate cancer cells treated both in vitro and in vivo with a COX-2 Inhibitor (Kirschenbaum et al, 2001). Thalidomide has been demonstrated to inhibit COX-2 and subsequent prostaglandin-E2 biosynthesis in a dose dependant manner (Fujita et al, 2001).

 

V. Prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy affecting men beyond middle age in developed countries. Although detection of early prostate cancer is increasing, many patients still present with metastatic disease. Hormone treatment in the form of androgen deprivation is an established therapeutic option for metastatic prostate cancer. In patients who respond to hormone manipulation, subsequent clonal expansion of hormone insensitive cancer cells results in loss of response with a mean time to tumour progression of less than 18 months. Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) is used as a clinical marker of tumour load and a serial increase in PSA values after initial successful androgen ablation usually indicates clinical progression to androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Androgen-independence can be defined as a rising PSA value of at least 20ng ml-1 on two consecutive occasions after the nadir of response to androgen ablation therapy, or a rise of at least 5ng ml-1 if the absolute PSA value was less than 20 ng ml-1 (Bubley et al, 1999). Various agents have been tested in an attempt to achieve second-line response in AIPC, including; corticosteroids, diethylstilboestrol, tamoxifen, aminoglutethamide, ketoconazole, suramin, estramustine, taxanes, mitozantrone and herceptin. Benefits in terms of disease suppression and survival are uncertain. The prognosis for patients with hormone refractory disease is poor; median overall survival is 12 -18 months.

 

A. Tumour biology and angiogenesis

The role of angiogenesis in the growth and metastasis of prostate cancer has been demonstrated by Weidner et al, (1993) who showed that increased microvessel density in prostate cancer specimens can predict advanced tumour stage. Mean microvessel counts are significantly greater in the primary tumours of patients with metastatic disease than in those without metastases, and a correlation between microvessel density and increasing pathological grade has been observed. Increased microvascularity also correlates with a poorer prognosis (Lissbrant et al, 1997). Rogatsch et al (1997) investigated whether the quantification of tumour microvessels can be reliably applied to prostatic core biopsies, as a means of detecting likely local tumour extension prior to radical prostatectomy. They observed a high degree of correlation between microvessel density in biopsies and the subsequent prostatectomy samples. The median microvessel density in core biopsies predicted the local tumour stage.

Malignant prostatic epithelial cells show increased expression of numerous angiogenic substances, including; basic FGF, (Mansson et al, 1989; Gleave et al, 1992; Nakamoto et al, 1992; Warren, 2001) transforming growth factor (TGF) a and -b, (Ikeda et al, 1987; Hofer et al, 1991; Harper et al, 1993; Truong et al, 1993; Cohen et al, 1994; Eastham et al, 1995; Steiner et al, 1994) epidermal growth factor (Ching et al, 1993; Ware, 1993) and platelet derived growth factor (Fudge et al, 1994; Sitaras et al, 1988). Elevated serum levels of TNF-a and basic FGF can be seen in patients with prostate cancer (Meyer et al, 1995; Nakashima et al, 1995).

 

B. Clinical trials

With the emergence of evidence implicating the involvement of angiogenesis in prostate cancer, the use of thalidomide as a potential therapeutic agent has been investigated. Figg et al, (2001b) have compared low-dose (200mg/day) and high dose (up to 1200 mg/day) thalidomide in patients with AIPC. The high dose regime commenced at 200mg/day with incremental rises of 200mg /day every two weeks up to a maximum of 1200mg where tolerated. Fifty patients were randomised to the low dose arm. In the high dose arm, thirty percent of patients were unable to tolerate doses of above 200mg/day due to the side effect profile. As a result of the high incidence of adverse effects, and since no patient showed a substantial decline in PSA, the high dose arm was discontinued after 13 patients were enrolled. The median time on study was 2.1 months for the low dose arm and 2.0 months for the high dose arm (range 35-247 days). Response to treatment was evaluated in terms of PSA reduction, changes in metastatic lesions on bone scan and measured tumour load as detected on serial CT scans. The assessment of circulating growth factors (basic FGF, VEGF, TNF-a and TGF-b) was also carried out. Reductions in PSA were observed in 58% of patients in the low dose arm and 68% of the high dose arm. Nine out of the 63 patients (14%) showed declines in PSA of ³50%, all of whom were in the low dose arm of the study. The failure of PSA response in the high dose arm may result from the up-regulation of PSA secretion which is seen in prostate cancer cell lines exposed to thalidomide (Dixon et al, 1999). Of the patients who had measurable disease on CT scanning, 14% had some reduction in tumour load. Two patients had radiographic improvement of bone scan lesions and both had sustained reductions in serum PSA. Declines in serum TGF-b were seen in the eight patients with PSA reductions at four months. There were also reductions in basic FGF in six of these patients. Figg and colleagues concluded from this trial that thalidomide may have modest anti-tumour activity through its anti-angiogenic properties in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Drake et al, (2003) examined the benefits of low dose thalidomide in patients with rising PSA after initial response to hormone manipulation therapy. Response to treatment was evaluated in terms of serum PSA reduction and growth factor levels. Twenty patients were enrolled in this study and given 100mg thalidomide once daily at bedtime. The mean time on study was 109 days (range 4–184 days) with 16 patients continuing thalidomide treatment for more than two months. Three men had PSA falls of ³50% with five other patients showing some decline. Of the 16 men who tolerated treatment for more than two months, six showed a fall in their serum PSA by a mean of 48%.

In this study serum growth factors were analysed in 11 patients at three months. There was an overall mean rise in both basic FGF and VEGF. However, when analysed according to PSA response, five out of the six men who manifested a decline in PSA showed a decline in mean values of both basic FGF and VEGF; at the time of loss of PSA response, there was a coincident rise in growth factor levels. Patients who demonstrated increasing PSA levels had associated rises in growth factors. Three patients discontinued low dose thalidomide due to adverse effects. The most commonly reported adverse reaction was constipation (n=9) followed by sedation hangover (n=3) and dizziness (n=2).

Clinical trials of single agent docetaxel in AIPC have demonstrated response rates of 20-60% (Logothetis, 2002). Accordingly, thalidomide has also been studied in combination with docetaxal in a phase II trial enrolling 75 patients with AIPC (Figg et al, 2001a; Dahut et al, 2004). Patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel, with or without a single night-time dose of thalidomide 200mg. 35% of those receiving docetaxel alone showed decrease in PSA of at least 50%, while 53% of patients in the combination arm demonstrated an equivalent response. At 18 months, overall survival in the docetaxel group was 42.9%. Compared with 68.2% in the combined arm. Of the first 43 patients treated with docetaxel and thalidomide, nine patients developed deep venous thrombosis and a further three suffered a cerebrovascular incident. There were no thromboembolic complications in the docetaxel group. Subsequent patients enrolled into the combined group were given low molecular weight heparin, preventing further thrombotic events.

Thalidomide combination therapy with the cytotoxic agents paclitaxel and estramustine has been evaluated (Daliani, 2003). Thirty patients with AIPC were given weekly paclitaxel for 2 of 3 weeks together with oral estramustine and escalating doses of thalidomide, titrating from 200 mg a day to 600 mg a day. Seventy-two percent of the 25 evaluable patients achieved a sustained decline in PSA levels of 50% or more. Twelve percent showed a drop of 80% or more. The men who experienced a drop in PSA also reported less bone pain. Four of the 29 men evaluable for toxicity developed Grade 3-4 deep venous thrombosis, despite warfarin prophylaxis, requiring treatment discontinuation in two patients. There were no cases of grade 2-4 neuropathy. The U.S. National Cancer Institute is undertaking a phase II trial of Estramustine, Docetaxel and Thalidomide in AIPC.

A phase II trial using a combination of thalidomide (100-200mg) with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in 17 AIPC patients with soft tissue or bone disease has been carried out (Dreicer et al, 2002). Partial response was seen in five of 13 evaluable patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated

 

VI. Renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 3% of all adult malignancies. Incidence of RCC has risen over the last 30 years, with greater use of ultrasonography and CT scanning increasingly detecting incidental tumours. The identification of early tumours has seemingly led to improved survival. However, the overall mortality rates for RCC have increased over this time, suggesting a possible change in tumour biology, perhaps due to environmental factors (Chow et al, 1999). One third of patients with RCC present with metastatic disease and 40% of the rest eventually develop distant metastases. The prognosis for these patients is poor, as RCC is resistant to most chemotherapeutic agents. Patients who have non-bulky metastatic disease and who are of good performance status may be suitable for immunotherapy. Nonetheless, only 10-15% of patients experience an objective response to immunotherapy with either interleukin-2 (IL-2) or a-interferon (α-IFN)(Negrier et al, 1998).

 

A. Tumour biology and angiogenesis

RCC is one of the few tumours in which spontaneous regression is recognised, with an estimated incidence of 0.3% (Vogelzang et al, 1992). Most cases have been in patients with pulmonary metastases and have occurred after nephrectomy, but regression of primary RCC has also been documented even in the absence of any treatment (Vogelzang et al, 1992).

RCCÕs are highly vascular tumours, as demonstrated by the distinctive neovascular pattern on renal angiography. The up-regulation of a variety of angiogenic factors and the renin angiotensin system has been reported (Nicol et al, 1997; Hii et al, 1998; Horie et al, 1999). Increased levels of mRNA for VEGF have been found in the majority of hypervascular renal cell carcinomas, while hypovascular tumours have exhibited low levels of this transcript (Brown et al, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1994). Increased levels of VEGF have also been found in the serum of patients with RCC and a correlation with stage and grade has been noted (Kato et al, 2000). Elevated serum levels of basic FGF have also been demonstrated in RCC and other possible angiogenic growth factors contributing include placental growth factor, TGF-b1, angiogenin, interleukin-8 and hepatocyte growth factor (Campbell, 1997). Sporadic and familial RCCÕs commonly demonstrate mutations or deletions in the Von Hippel Lindau gene, and this genetic change may lead to increased expression of VEGF (Stebbins et al, 1999). The angiogenic dependence of RCCÕs and the involvement of such genes and growth factors have led to the investigation of a variety of antiangiogenic treatments including thalidomide, endostatin, interleukin-2, squalamine and neutralising antibodies to VEGF.

 

B. Clinical trials

Numerous trials employing thalidomide in RCC have been undertaken. These are summarised in Table 1. Eisen et al, (2000) carried out a study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and ovarian and breast cancer. Three of 18 patients with RCC showed a partial response to treatment (100mg daily). A further three patients had stable disease for at least three months. A further phase II trial by the same group evaluated the use of high dose oral thalidomide (600mg daily) (Stebbing et al, 2001). 25 patients were enrolled in this study with advanced metastatic RCC. Nearly all had undergone prior surgery and systemic immunotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy. Progressive disease was identified in all patients prior to study entry. Three patients were removed from the trial at an early stage due to toxicity


 

Table 1. Summary of trials of thalidomide in renal cell carcinoma

 

Trial

 

No. of patients

Additional drug

Thalidomide dose

Prior nephrectomy

Efficacy: Complete response

Partial response

Stable disease /minor response

Progression free survival

Median survival

Median time to progression

Eisen, (1999)

No

18

none

100mg

n/s

0

3

13

17%  >3 months

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

 

0

17

72

 

 

 

Stebbing (2001)

No

25

none

100-600mg

24

0

2

12

n/s

9 months

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

96

0

9

54.5

 

 

 

Novik (2001)

No

27

none

100-1000mg

21

0

0

7

n/s

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

78

0

0

26

 

 

 

Motzer (2002)

No

26

none

200-800mg

15

0

0

16

32%  > 6 months

n/s

4 months

 

%

 

 

 

58

0

0

64

 

 

 

Daliani (2002)

No

20

none

200-1200mg

19

0

2

9

n/s

18.3 months

4.7 months

 

%

 

 

 

95

0

10.5

47

 

 

 

Li (2001)

No

36

none

200-1200mg

31

0

2

9

32%  >5 months

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

86

0

6

31

 

 

 

Srinivas (2002)

No

14

none

200-1200mg

11

0

0

6

n/s

9.3 months

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

79

0

0

46

 

 

 

Escudier (2002)

No

40

none

400-1200mg

32

0

0

9

24% >6 months

10 months

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

80

0

6

27

 

 

 

Minor (2002)

No

29

none

400-1200mg

19

1

2

3

n/s

3.5 months

2.3 months

 

%

 

 

 

79

0

4

12.5

 

 

 

Nathan (2002)

No

13

IFN-a2a

100-400mg

n/s

0

0

0

n/s

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

 

0

0

0

 

 

 

Clarke (2004)

No

30

IFN-a

100-1000mg

17

0

2

8

n/s

68 weeks

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

57

0

6.7

26.7

 

 

 

Gordon (2004)

No

175 in thalidomide arm

IFN-a2b

200-1000mg

190

0

5

50

n/s

10.8 months

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

74

0

3.1

31.3

 

 

 

Olenki (2003)

No

31

IL-2

100-200mg

29

1

1

0

n/s

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

93

3

3

0

 

 

 

Amato (2002)

No

15

IL-2

200-600mg

15

1

5

2

n/s

n/s

n/s

 

%

 

 

 

100

10

50

20

 

 

 


and five other patients required dose reduction due to peripheral neuropathy. Of the 22 assessable patients, two (9%) achieved a partial response and 12 had stable disease for 12 months, with dose reduction due to toxicity. In many of these patients there was a significant reduction in serum TNF-a.

Minor et al, (2002) investigated the activity of thalidomide in patients with advanced RCC in a phase two study involving 29 patients. All patients had advanced progressive metastatic RCC disease and many were poor performance status. 72% had received prior therapy in the form of interleukin-2, a-interferon and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients were started on a daily dose of thalidomide of 400mg rising in increments of 200 mg to a maximum dose of 1200 mg. Tumour responses were evaluated using South Western Oncology Group criteria and in some patients serum levels of VEGF 165 was monitored. Of the 24 patients assessable for response, only one demonstrated a partial response. Three patients had stable disease for over six months. The median time to progression for all 29 patients was 2.3 months and median survival was 3.5 months. VEGF 165 was measured in 8 patients and no obvious change in plasma levels was demonstrated.

The largest trial to date involved 40 patients treated with thalidomide doses starting at 400mg daily rising to 800mg and then 1200mg (Escudier et al, 2002). At 12, 18 and 24 weeks 31, 25 and 17 patients remained on treatment respectively. At nine months, only eight patients were still on study therapy, with all patients stopping treatment after one year due to severe neuropathy. After 6 months, two patients (5%) achieved partial response, with 9 patients (22%) having stable disease. The one year survival was 38%. In this study, neuropathy and thromboembolism were significant side effects.

A further trial examining the use of escalating doses of thalidomide was carried out by Daliani et al, (2002). Twenty patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled and treated with doses starting at 200mg, increasing in weekly increments up to a target maximum dose of 1200mg per day. Nineteen patients were evaluable for response, of whom two patients (10.5%) had a partial response and nine patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 4.7 months (range 0.7-31.3 months). Thirteen patients remained on the study at three months and 12 of these tolerated a maximum dose of 1200mg. Delayed dose reductions were required for three patients because of peripheral sensory neuropathy. A further three patients developed thomboembolic events believed to be related to thalidomide.

Motzer used doses of thalidomide up to 800mg in advanced RCC (Motzer et al, 2002). Twenty five patients were assessable for response. No patient achieved a partial or complete response; stable disease was observed in 16 patients (64%), which was maintained for a mean duration of 6 months. The median time to disease progression was 4 months. The one-year survival was 57%. A further small study recruited 14 patients (Srinivas and Guardino, 2002) comparing low dose thalidomide (200mg/day) to higher escalating doses (800–1200mg/day). Six patients (46%) achieved stable disease, mainly in the low dose arm, with no objective responses. Stable disease was the best response obtained by Novik et al, (2001) in a phase II trial involving 27 patients with metastatic RCC, including lung, brain and liver metastases. Li et al, (2001) treated 36 patients with thalidomide (200-1200mg) All of these patients had failed to respond to prior interleukin-2 therapy. Seventeen of the patients managed to tolerate the maximum dose. Partial responses were seen in 2 of the 29 evaluable patients with stable disease in 9 further patients.

Thalidomide has also been investigated in combination with immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of RCC. In a phase II trial to examine the efficacy of interferon a-2a (IFNa-2a) with thalidomide (Nathan et al, 2002), no responses to treatment were seen. Five patients experienced serious adverse side effects, which were attributed to the membrane destabilising effects of both of these agents. The authors concluded that caution is needed in combining these two therapies. A further phase II trial (Clarke et al, 2004) looking at thalidomide in combination with IFN-a in 30 patients reported an objective response rate of 7% with no complete responses, 2 partial responses and 8 patients achieving stable disease. One third of patients experienced toxicity that required discontinuation of thalidomide.

In a phase III study of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (Gordon et al, 2004), interferon–a2b (IFN-a2b) in combination with thalidomide (200-1000mg daily) was compared with IFN–a2b alone. There was no difference in objective response, but there was a higher percentage of patients with stable disease in the combination therapy arm (31.3% vs 18.5%). This is consistent with thalidomideÕs known cytostatic activity, but there was no discernable difference in the progression free survival curves. Furthermore, no clinically significant difference in quality of life was achieved between the arms at baseline or through treatment.

As single therapy for metastatic RCC, IL-2 can elicit clinical responses, but only in a minority of patients. A phase I trial of combination IL-2 and oral thalidomide involving 31 patients (Olencki et al, 2003) demonstrated moderate to severe toxicity with one complete response and one partial response. More promising responses have been reported by (Amato et al, 2002), administering combination therapy for 9 months, followed by 6 months of thalidomide monotherapy. An initial phase I trial, involving only a small number of patients (n=15), showed 5 partial responses and 1 complete response. Later data from the same trial reported further responses, which were sustained for at least 12-18 months. A phase II trial recruited 37 patients, of whom 33 were assessable for response. This produced an objective response rate of 39% with 2 complete responses, 11 partial responses and 10 patients with stable disease.

 

VII. Conclusions

Thalidomide has numerous biological actions; suppression of growth factor levels gives rise to anti-angiogenic and tumour cytostatic effects, but also substantial adverse drug reactions. The biological actions have led to the application of thalidomide in various clinical scenarios on an empirical basis, particularly where current management options are limited. The current treatment options for AIPC and advanced RCC are primarily palliative. The events leading to progression in prostate cancer include angiogenesis. Clinical trials of thalidomide in AIPC indicate a response in a subgroup of patients, which correlates with alterations in growth factor levels. This has not been translated into a clinical management option as yet, but does provide some insight into the biology of androgen-independence and the potential for pharmacological manipulation of this complex process. The use of thalidomide in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs appears more promising. RCCs are chemotherapy-resistant; objective responses to thalidomide also appear to be infrequent (Table 1). The greater clinical benefit with low dose thalidomide in certain clinical trials in AIPC and RCC indicates that the immunomodulatory effects of thalidomide can outweigh the cytokine responses.

 

References

Adeoti AG, Vega KJ, Dajani EZ, Trotman BW and Kloser PC (1998) Idiopathic esophageal ulceration in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: successful treatment with misoprostol and viscous lidocaine. Am J Gastroenterol 93, 2069-74.

Amato R, Breheny S and Tracy E (2002) Phase I/II study of thalidomide + interleukin II (IL-2) for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (abstract 759). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21, 190a

Ando Y, Fuse E, Figg WD (2002) Thalidomide metabolism by the CYP2C subfamily. Clin Cancer Res 8, 1964-73.

Aronson IK, Yu R, West D P, Van den Broek H and Antel J (1984) Thalidomide-induced peripheral neuropathy. Effect of serum factor on nerve cultures. Arch Dermatol 120, 1466-70.

Bauer KS, Dixon SC and Figg WD (1998) Inhibition of angiogenesis by thalidomide requires metabolic activation, which is species-dependent. Biochem Pharmacol 55, 1827-34.

Brown LF, Berse B, JackmanR W, Tognazzi K, Manseau EJ, Dvorak HF and Senger DR (1993) Increased expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in kidney and bladder carcinomas. Am J Pathol 143, 1255-62.

Bubley GJ, Carducci M, DahutW, Dawson N, Daliani D, Eisenberger M, FiggWD, Freidlin B, Halabi S, Hudes G, Hussain M, Kaplan R, Myers C, Oh W, Petrylak DP, Reed E, Roth B, Sartor O, Scher H, Simons J, Sinibaldi V, Small EJ, Smith M R, Trump DL, Wilding G et al (1999) Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17, 3461-7.

Campbell SC (1997) Advances in angiogenesis research: relevance to urological oncology. J Urol 158, 1663-74.

Capitosti SM, Hansen TP and Brown ML (2004) Thalidomide analogues demonstrate dual inhibition of both angiogenesis and prostate cancer. Bioorg Med Chem 12, 327-36.

Ching KZ, Ramsey E, Pettigrew N, D'Cunha R, Jason M and Dodd JG (1993) Expression of mRNA for epidermal growth factor transforming growth factor-a and their receptor in human prostate tissue and cell lines. Mol Cell Biochem 126, 151-8.

Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL and Fraumeni JF Jr (1999) Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 281, 1628-31.

Clarke PE, Hall C, Miller A, Ridenhour KP, Stindt D, Lovato JF, Patton SE, Brinkley W, Das S and Torti FM. (2004) Phase II trial of combination interferon-a and thalidomide as first-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol. 63, 1061-1064.

Clemmensen OJ, Olsen PZ and Andersen KE (1984) Thalidomide neurotoxicity. Arch Dermatol 120, 338-41.

Cohen DW, Simak R, Fair W R, MelamedJ, Scher HI and Cordon-Cardo C (1994) Expression of transforming growth factor-a and the epidermal growth factor receptor in human prostate tissues. J Urol 152, 2120-4.

Dahut WL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Liu Y, FedenkoK M, SteinbergS M, Wright JJ, Parnes H, Chen CC, Jones E, Parker CE, Linehan W M and Figg WD (2004) Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 22, 2532-9.

Daliani D (2003) A Tolerance and efficacy Study of Thalidomide Paclitaxel and Estramustine for Patients with Chemotherapy Refractory Androgen Independent Prostate cancer. Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium XXI, Abstract 48.

Daliani DD, Papandreou CN, Thall PF, Wang X, Perez C, Oliva R, Pagliaro L and Amato R (2002) A pilot study of thalidomide in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 95, 758-65.

D'Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E and Folkman J (1994) Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 4082-5.

Daniel TO, Liu H, Morrow JD, Crews BC and MarnettL J (1999) Thromboxane A2 is a mediator of cyclooxygenase-2-dependent endothelial migration and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 59, 4574-7.

Dixon SC, Kruger EA, Bauer KS and Figg WD (1999) Thalidomide up-regulates prostate-specific antigen secretion from LNCaP cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 43 Suppl, S78-84.

Drake MJ, Robson W, Mehta P, Schofield I, Neal DE and Leung HY (2003) An open-label phase II study of low-dose thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 88, 822-7.

Dreicer R, Elson P, Klein EA, Peereboom D, ByzovaT and Plow E (2002) Phase II trial of GM-CSF + thalidomide in patients with androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer (abstract 782). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21, 196a

Dunzendorfer S, Schratzberger P, Reinisch N, Kahler CM and WiedermannC J (1997) Effects of thalidomide on neutrophil respiratory burst chemotaxis and transmigration of cytokine- and endotoxin-activated endothelium. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 356, 529-35.

Eastham JA, Truong LD, Rogers E, KattanM, Flanders KC, Scardino PT and Thompson TC (1995) Transforming growth factor-b 1: comparative immunohistochemical localization in human primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Lab Invest 73, 628-35.

Eisen T, Boshoff C, Mak I, Sapunar F, Vaughan MM, Pyle L, JohnstonS R, Ahern R, Smith IE and Gore ME (2000) Continuous low dose Thalidomide: a phase II study in advanced melanoma, renal cell,ovarian and breast cancer. Br J Cancer 82, 812-7.

Escudier B, Lassau N, Couanet D, Angevin E, Mesrati F, Leborgne S, Garofano A, Leboulaire C, Dupouy N and Laplanche A (2002) Phase II trial of thalidomide in renal-cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 13, 1029-35.

Faure M, Thivolet J and Gaucherand M (1980) Inhibition of PMN leukocytes chemotaxis by thalidomide. Arch Dermatol Res 269, 275-80.

Figg WD, Arlen P, Gulley J, Fernandez P, Noone M, Fedenko K, Hamilton M, Parker C, Kruger EA, Pluda J and Dahut WL (2001a) A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 28, 62-6.

Figg WD, Dahut W, Duray P, Hamilton M, Tompkins A, Steinberg SM, Jones E, Premkumar A, Linehan WM, Floeter MK, Chen CC, Dixon S, Kohler DR, Kruger EA, Gubish E, Pluda JM and Reed E (2001b) A randomized phase II trial of thalidomide, an angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7, 1888-93.

Figg WD, Raje S, Bauer K S, Tompkins A, Venzon D, Bergan R, Chen A, Hamilton M, Pluda J and Reed E (1999) Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in an elderly prostate cancer population. J Pharm Sci 88, 121-5.

Fudge K, Wang CY and Stearns ME (1994) Immunohistochemistry analysis of platelet-derived growth factor A and B chains and platelet-derived growth factor a and b receptor expression in benign prostatic hyperplasias and Gleason-graded human prostate adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 7, 549-54.

Fujita J, Mestre J R, Zeldis J B, Subbaramaiah K and Dannenberg AJ (2001) Thalidomide and its analogues inhibit lipopolysaccharide-mediated Iinduction of cyclooxygenase-2. Clin Cancer Res 7, 3349-55.

Fullerton PM and O'Sullivan DJ (1968) Thalidomide neuropathy: a clinical electrophysiological and histological follow-up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 31, 543-51.

Geitz H, Handt S and Zwingenberger K (1996) Thalidomide selectively modulates the density of cell surface molecules involved in the adhesion cascade. Immunopharmacology 31, 213-21.

Gleave ME, Hsieh JT, von Eschenbach AC and Chung LW (1992) Prostate and bone fibroblasts induce human prostate cancer growth in vivo: implications for bidirectional tumor-stromal cell interaction in prostate carcinoma growth and metastasis. J Urol 147, 1151-9.

Gordon MS, Manola J, Fairclough D, Cella D, Richardson R, Sosman J, Kasimis B, Dutcher JP and Wilding G (2004) Low dose interferon-a2b (IFN) + thalidomide (T) in patients with previously untreated renal cell cancer (RCC). Improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but not quality of life (QoL) or overall survival (OS). A phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2898) (abstract 4516). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22, 14S (July 15 Supplement), 4516.

Harper ME, Goddard L, Glynne-Jones E, Wilson DW, Price-Thomas M, Peeling WB and Griffiths K (1993) An immunocytochemical analysis of TGF a expression in benign and malignant prostatic tumors. Prostate 23, 9-23.

Hii SI, Nicol DL, Gotley DC, Thompson LC, Green MK and Jonsson JR (1998) Captopril inhibits tumour growth in a xenograft model of human renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 77, 880-3.

Hofer DR, Sherwood ER, Bromberg WD, Mendelsohn J, Lee C and Kozlowski JM (1991) Autonomous growth of androgen-independent human prostatic carcinoma cells: role of transforming growth factor a. Cancer Res 51, 2780-5.

Horie S, Aruga S, Kawamata H, Okui N, Kakizoe T and Kitamura T (1999) Biological role of HGF/MET pathway in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 161, 990-7.

Ikeda T, Lioubin MN and Marquardt H (1987) Human transforming growth factor type b 2: production by a prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line purification and initial characterization. Biochemistry 26, 2406-10.

Kato T, Tsuchiya N, Sato K, Ogawa O, Sasaki R, Shimoda N, Satoh T, Habuchi T (2000) Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and normal level of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in the sera of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Aktuelle Urolgie 31(S1), 15-17

Keenan RJ, Eiras G, Burckart GJ, StuartR S, Hardesty RL, Vogelsang G, Griffith BP and Zeevi A (1991) Immunosuppressive properties of thalidomide Inhibition of in vitro lymphocyte proliferation alone and in combination with cyclosporine or FK506. Transplantation 52, 908-10.

Keifer JA, Guttridge DC, Ashburner BP and Baldwin AS Jr (2001) Inhibition of NF-kB activity by thalidomide through suppression of IkB kinase activity. J Biol Chem 276, 22382-7.

Kirschenbaum A, Liu X, Yao S and Levine AC (2001) The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in prostate cancer. Urology 58, 127-31.

Li Z, Amato R, Papandreou CN, Pagliaro L, Kim J, Millikan R, Loggins-Coffman J, Perez C, Logothetis CJ and Daliani D (2001) Phase II Study of Thalidomide for patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (MRCC) Progressing after Interleukin-2 (IL-2)-Based Therapy (Rx) (abstract 717). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20, 180a.

Lissbrant IF, Stattin P, Damber JE and Bergh A (1997) Vascular density is a predictor of cancer-specific survival in prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 33, 38-45.

Logothetis CJ (2002) Docetaxel in the integrated management of prostate cancer. Current applications and future promise. Oncology (Huntingt) 16, 63-72.

Mansson PE, Adams P, Kan M and McKeehan WL (1989) Heparin-binding growth factor gene expression and receptor characteristics in normal rat prostate and two transplantable rat prostate tumors. Cancer Res 49, 2485-94.

Marriott JB, Westby M and Cookson S (1998) CC-3052: a water-soluble analog of thalidomide and potent inhibitor of activation-induced TNF-a production. J Immunol 161, 4236-4243.

Meyer GE, Yu E, Siegal J A, Petteway J C, Blumenstein BA and Brawer M K (1995) Serum basic fibroblast growth factor in men with and without prostate carcinoma. Cancer 76, 2304-11.

Minor DR, Monroe D, Damico LA, Meng G, Suryadevara U and Elias L (2002) A phase II study of thalidomide in advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 20, 389-93.

Molloy FM, Floeter MK, Syed NA, Sandbrink F, Culcea E, Steinberg SM, Dahut W, Pluda J, Kruger EA, Reed E and Figg WD (2001) Thalidomide neuropathy in patients treated for metastatic prostate cancer. Muscle Nerve 24, 1050-7.

Moreira AL, Sampaio EP, Zmuidzinas A, Frindt P, Smith KA and Kaplan G (1993) Thalidomide exerts its inhibitory action on tumor necrosis factor a by enhancing mRNA degradation. J Exp Med 177, 1675-80.

Motzer RJ, Berg W, Ginsberg M, Russo P, Vuky J, Yu R, Bacik J and Mazumdar M (2002) Phase II trial of thalidomide for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20, 302-6.

Muller GW, Chen R and Huang SY (1999) Amino-substituted thalidomide analogs: potent inhibitors of TNF-a production. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 9, 1625-1630.

Muller GW, Corral LG and Shire MG (1996) Structural modifications of thalidomide produce analogs with enhanced tumor necrosis factor inhibitory activity. J Med Chem 39, 3238-3240.

Nakamoto T, Chang CS, Li AK and Chodak GW (1992) Basic fibroblast growth factor in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 52, 571-7.

Nakashima J, Tachibana M, Ueno M, Baba S and Tazaki H (1995) Tumor necrosis factor and coagulopathy in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Res 55, 4881-5.

Nathan PD, Gore ME and Eisen TG (2002) Unexpected toxicity of combination thalidomide and interferon a-2a treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20, 1429-30.

Negrier S, Escudier B, Lasset C, Douillard J Y, Savary J, Chevreau C, Ravaud A, Mercatello A, Peny J, Mousseau M, Philip T and Tursz T (1998) Recombinant human interleukin-2, recombinant human interferon alfa-2a, or both in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Groupe Francais d'Immunotherapie. N Engl J Med 338, 1272-8.

Nicol D, HiiS I, Walsh M, Teh B, Thompson L, Kennett C and Gotley D (1997) Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is increased in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 157, 1482-6.

Novik Y, Dutcher JP, Larkin M and Wiernik PH (2001) Phase II Study of Thalidomide in Advanced Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: A Single Institute Experience (abstract 1057). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 13, 243.

Nowack E (1965) [The sensitive phase in thalidomide embryopathy]. Humangenetik 1, 516-36.

Olencki T, Malhi S, Mekhail T, Dreicer R, Elson P, Wood L and Bukowski RM (2003) Phase I trial of thalidomide and interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (abstract 1554). ASCO 22, 387.

Rajkumar SV, Mesa RA and Tefferi A (2002) A review of angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in hematologic malignancies. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 11, 33-47.

Rogatsch H, Hittmair A, Reissigl A, Mikuz G and Feichtinger H (1997) Microvessel density in core biopsies of prostatic adenocarcinoma: a stage predictor? J Pathol 182, 205-10.

Sampaio EP, Sarno EN, Galilly R, Cohn ZA and Kaplan G (1991) Thalidomide selectively inhibits tumor necrosis factor a production by stimulated human monocytes. J Exp Med 173, 699-703.

Scheffler MR, Colburn W, Kook A and Thomas SD (1999) Thalidomide does not alter estrogen-progesterone hormone single dose pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 65, 483-90.

Settles B, Stevenson A, Wilson K, Mack C, Ezell T, Davis MF and Taylor LD (2001) Down-regulation of cell adhesion molecules LFA-1 and ICAM-1 after in vitro treatment with the anti-TNF-a agent thalidomide. Cell Mol Biol 47, 1105-14.

Sheskin J (1965) Thalidomide in the Treatment of Lepra Reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 40, 303-6.

Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zeddis J and Barlogie B (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341, 1565-71.

Sitaras NM, Sariban E, Bravo M, Pantazis P and Antoniades HN (1988) Constitutive production of platelet-derived growth factor-like proteins by human prostate carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 48, 1930-5.

Somers GF (1960) Pharmacological properties of thalidomide (a-phthalimido glutarimide) a new sedative hypnotic drug. Bri Pharm Chemother 15, 111-6.

Srinivas S and Guardino AE (2002) Randomized trial of high and low dose thalidomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (abstract 2403). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21,

Stebbing J, Benson C, Eisen T, Pyle L, Smalley K, Bridle H, Mak I, Sapunar F, Ahern R and Gore ME (2001) The treatment of advanced renal cell cancer with high-dose oral thalidomide. Br J Cancer 85, 953-8.

Stebbins CE, Kaelin WG Jr and Pavletich NP (1999) Structure of the VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB complex: implications for VHL tumor suppressor function. Science 284, 455-61.

Steiner MS, Zhou ZZ, Tonb DC and Barrack ER (1994) Expression of transforming growth factor-b 1 in prostate cancer. Endocrinology 135, 2240-7.

Stirling D (2000) Pharmacology of Thalidomide. Semin Haematol 37, 5-14.

Takahashi A, Sasaki H, Kim SJ, Tobisu K, Kakizoe T, Tsukamoto T, Kumamoto Y, Sugimura T and Terada M (1994) Markedly increased amounts of messenger RNAs for vascular endothelial growth factor and placenta growth factor in renal cell carcinoma associated with angiogenesis. Cancer Res 54, 4233-7.

Thompson MA, Witzig TE, Kumar S, Timm MM, Haug J, Fonseca R, Greipp PR, Lust JA and Rajkumar SV (2003) Plasma levels of tumour necrosis factor a and interleukin-6 predict progression-free survival following thalidomide therapy in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 123, 305-8.

Truong LD, Kadmon D, McCune BK, Flanders KC, Scardino PT and Thompson TC (1993) Association of transforming growth factor-b 1 with prostate cancer: an immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 24, 4-9.

Tsambaos D, Bolsen K, Georgiou S, Monastirli A and Goerz G (1994) Effects of oral thalidomide on rat liver and skin microsomal P450 isozyme activities and on urinary porphyrin excretion: interaction with oral hexachlorobenzene. Arch Dermatol Res 286, 347-9.

Turk BE, Jiang H and Liu JO (1996) Binding of thalidomide to a1-acid glycoprotein may be involved in its inhibition of tumor necrosis factor a production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 7552-6.

Vogelzang NJ, Priest ER and Borden L (1992) Spontaneous regression of histologically proved pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a case with 5-year followup. J Urol 148, 1247-8.

Ware JL (1993) Growth factors and their receptors as determinants in the proliferation and metastasis of human prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 12, 287-301.

Warren NJ (2001) Thalomid Capsules [package insert]. Celgene Corporation.

Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, Blumenfeld W and Folkman J (1993) Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143, 401-9.

Yamada M, Kawai M, Kawai Y and Mashima Y (1999) The effect of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor on corneal angiogenesis in the rat. Curr Eye Res 19, 300-4.


 

 

    

Dr. Simon Pridgeon                     Dr. Marcus Drake