Cancer Therapy Vol 3, 243-248, 2005
Update on cervical cancer
Aaron
C Han1,*, Maria Merzouk2, Richard Z Belch2
1Department
of Pathology,
2Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Reading Hospital Regional
Cancer Center
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Aaron C Han, The Reading Hospital Regional Cancer Center, 6th Avenue and
Spruce Street, West Reading, PA 19612; Phone: 610-988-8088; Fax: 610-988-5185;
Email: HanA@ReadingHospital.org
Key words: cervical
cancer, HPV biology,
epidemiology and screening, Diagnosis
Abbreviations:
carcinoma in situ, (CIS); computed axial tomography, (CT);
Human papillomavirus, (HPV); lymphovascular space
involvement, (LVI); magnetic
resonance imaging, (MRI); positron emission tomography-CT, (PET-CT); retinoblastoma, (Rb)
Summary
Cervical
cancer is a significant cause of mortality worldwide in spite of recent
advances with efficacious screening methods. The role of human papillomavirus as the
causative agent of cervical cancer is well established. In this review, we examine the biology,
epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies for cervical cancer. We also outline potential avenues for
worldwide prevention of this disease, and potential therapeutic targets.
Cervical cancer continues to be a significant public health problem. It is the second leading gynecologic malignancy affecting women in the world (Platz and Benda, 1995; Rohan et al, 2003). Cervical cancers are predominately squamous cell carcinomas, with approximately 20% of the cases are accounted for by adenocarcinoma which appears to be increasing in frequency. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is acknowledged as the causative infectious agent in the vast majority of cases of cervical cancer (Stoler, 2003). HPV infections leads to precursor lesions, progressing to dysplasias and frank carcinoma over time. There is often an orderly progression to invasive cancer, and can occur asymptomatically over a course of 10-20 years.
HPV is a DNA virus which is the causative
agent of cervical cancer (Stoler, 2003). This virus is sexually transmitted.
More than 80 types of HPV have been identified. The majority of cervical
cancers are associated with types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35. These are often
referred to as high risk HPV types, in contrast to others which are more
associated with warts, condyloma and low grade cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia (CIN). Of these HPV 16 is associated with about 50% of cases of
cervical cancer. HPV can infect and cause a acute transient infection, but
these frequently may clear and the patient would not be at risk for neoplastic
transformation (Baseman and Koutsky, 2005). It is widely accepted that with
persistant infection, and integration of the HPV genome into the host DNA is
the background in which carcinogenesis occurs (Ferenczy and Franco, 2002). HPV
proteins encoded by E6 and E7 genes interact with cellular proteins including
p53 and Rb gene, respectively, which regulate cell cycle, and presumably this
pathway is involved in cervical carcinogenesis (Munger et al, 1992; Giarre et
al, 2001).
Cervical cancer screening using the
Papanicolaou smear has effected marked impact on this disease, reducing both
the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer (Foulks, 1998). In the United
States for the period 1996 to 2000, the average annual age adjusted incidence
rate for cervical cancer was 8.7 per 100,000 women. This incidence reaches a
peak in white women at ages 45-49; while it continues to increase beyond that
age in black women. Women older than 50 years of age have a higher incidence than
those younger (6.7 versus 13.9 per 100,000), with mortality rates also
increasing with age, being more than four fold higher in women over 50 years of
age. The age adjusted mortality rate from cervix cancer in the United States
was 3.0 per 100,000 women in the period between 1996 and 2000. This is a
significant reduction compared to data from 1975 when mass screening was first
widely adopted, at which time the age adjusted incidence and mortality rate
were 14.8 and 5.6 per 100,000 women respectively.
Socioeconomic status impacts on
incidence, and mortality in patients with cervical cancer (Singh et al, 2004;
Wang et al, 2004). Lower social economic status confers a 1.6 fold increase
risk for developing carcinoma in situ
(CIS) when compared with those with higher socioeconomic status. A two fold
increase risk for cancer was also correlated with limited accessibility to the
healthcare system. Social and economic pressures can also indirectly affect the
incidence of cervix cancer through lifestyle and cultural factors, such as
sexual behavior, smoking and diet which are known risk factors. Parity, oral
contraceptive use, smoking and other concomitant sexually transmitted disease
appear to play a role in cervical carcinogenesis (Castellsague et al, 2002). Dietary
factors as vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, folic acid, as well as the immune
status are also linked to the disease progression.
IV. Diagnosis
Abnormal bleeding presenting as
post-coital bleeding, intermenstrual or post-menopausal bleeding remains the
most common presenting symptoms of cervical carcinoma (ACOG, 2002). Less than
10% of cases are asymptomatic when detected by cervical screening. Other
presenting symptoms, such as urinary dysfunction, pelvic pressure or pain,
sciatic pain in advanced disease may be present. Biopsies, whether
colposcopically directed or a visible gross lesion will provide the tissue for
histologic diagnosis. Endocervical curettage, cervical conization and
endometrial biopsy may contribute to the diagnosis, especially in the absence
of an obvious lesion.
The extent of the disease at presentation
remains the most important prognostic factor (Pecorelli and Odicino, 2003).
Clinical staging as defined by the 1994 FIGO staging system for cervical
carcinoma is useful (Table 1). Cervical
cancer continues to be a clinically staged disease, as opposed to the surgical
staging used in defining other gynecologic malignancies. Survival is related to
stage, with 5-year survivals ranging from 99% (for early stage IA) to 15% stage
IV disease. The earliest of stage I disease are based on histologic examination
and microscopic measurements of the depth of tumor invasion.
Other prognostic indicators used for treatment
planning include radiologic findings from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) (Chiang and Quek, 2003). Because clinical staging
remains subjective, lesions may be understaged in up to 20-30% of cases, and
these may correspond to nodal involvement or parametrial spread. On the other
hand, overstaging can result from pelvic inflammatory
disease
Table 1. The 1994 FIGO staging system for cervical carcinoma
|
Stage 0 |
Carcinoma in situ, cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia grade III |
||
|
Stage I |
Carcinoma strictly confined
to the cervix (extension to the corpus is disregarded) |
||
|
|
IA |
Invasive carcinoma that can
be diagnosed only by microscopy. All macroscopically visible lesions –
even with superficial invasion –are allotted to be stage IB carcinomas.
Invasion is limited to a measured stromal invasion with a maximal depth of
5.0 mm and a horizontal extension of not more than 7.0 mm. Depth of invasion
should be not more than 5.0 mm taken from the base of the epithelium of the
original tissue-superficial or glandular. The involvement of vascular
spaces-venous or lymphatic-should not change the stage allotment. |
|
|
|
|
IA1 |
Measured
stromal invasion of not more than 3.0 mm in depth and extension of not more
than 7.0 mm. |
|
|
|
IA2 |
Measured
stromal invasion of greater than 3.0 mm and not more than 5.0 mm with an
extension of not more than 7.0 mm. |
|
|
IB |
Clinically visible lesions
limited to the cervix uteri or preclinical cancers greater than Stage IA |
|
|
|
|
IB1 |
Clinically
visible lesions not more than 4.0 cm |
|
|
|
IB2 |
Clinically
visible lesions greater than 4.0 cm |
|
Stage II |
Cervical carcinoma that invades
beyond the uterus, but not to the pelvic wall or to the lower third of the
vagina |
||
|
|
IIA |
No obvious parametrial
involvement |
|
|
|
IIB |
Obvious parametrial
involvement |
|
|
Stage III |
The carcinoma has extended
to the pelvic wall. On rectal examination, there is no cancer-free space
between the tumor and the pelvic wall. The tumor involves the lower third of
the vagina. All cases with hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney are
included, unless they are known to be due to other causes. |
||
|
|
IIIA |
Tumor that involves the
lower third of the vagina, with no extension to the pelvic wall |
|
|
|
IIIB |
Extension to the pelvic
wall and/or hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney |
|
|
Stage IV |
The carcinoma has extended
beyond the true pelvis, or biopsy proven involvement of the mucosa of the
bladder or rectum. A bullous edema, as such, does not permit a case to be
allotted to stage IV. |
||
|
|
IVA |
Spread of the growth to
adjacent organs |
|
|
|
IVB |
Spread to distant organs |
|
and other non-neoplastic pathology, which is estimated to be as
high as 20% in stage IIIB disease. The use of positron emission tomography-CT
(PET-CT) has been shown in some studies to have a high specificity and
sensitivity in cervix cancer staging, approaching a positive predicted value of
100% and a negative predicted value of 96% in patients with early stage disease
(Kumar and Alavi, 2004). This may be used more frequently in the future for
accurate staging in cases with equivocal clinical findings especially in
advanced disease to assess disease extension.
V. Treatment and management
Superficially invasive cervix cancer
carries an excellent prognosis. Both depth of tumor invasion, and degree of
superficial tumor spread are related to the probability of nodal metastases.
The presence of lymphovascular space involvement (LVI), although not in the
FIGO staging schema, also appears to imparts a more significant risk of
metastatic tumor spread (Graflun et al, 2004). In IA2 lesions, the risk of
tumor recurrence is less than 1% if there is no LVI. This risk increases to 17%
when LVI is noted by pathologic examination. Stromal response, histologic grade
and tumor histology have been implicated as prognostic factors but the data
pertaining to these remain weak.
Microinvasive cervical carcinoma is often
treated with a simple extrafascial hysterectomy (Mota, 2003). Early stage
cancer, usually referring to stage IB1 (equal to or less than 4 cm) and early
stage IIA cancers can potentially be cured with surgery (Lu and Burke, 2000).
Traditionally, the treatment of choice has been radical hysterectomy or with
radiation therapy, with comparable cure rates (Greven et al, 1999). Prospective
randomized studies directly comparing surgery versus chemoradiation have not
been forthcoming. Chemoradiation is utilized in conjunction with surgery for the
treatment of bulky tumors (greater than 4 cm) Radiation is utilized after
radical hysterectomy in high-risk patients with positive lymph nodes, positive
surgical margins of resection, or tumor involving parametria (Kim et al, 2005).
The role and benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy after hysterectomy is not yet
defined.
Locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stage
IIB-IVA) is treated with chemoradiation for the most part utilizing a
platinum-based chemotherapy (Greven et al, 1999; ACOG 2002). External beam radiation
and brachytherapy provide tumoricidal management for advanced cervical
carcinoma. Neither surgery nor chemoradiation are without their inherent risk
of a major complication. Perioperative complications associated with surgery
are rare; and late complications possibly include lymphocyst formation,
lymphedema, bowel and bladder dysfunction. Although the risk of major
complications related to radiation therapy is low, the incidence increases with
time, and include fistulization, involving either bowel or bladder, and small
bowel obstruction. Thin body habitus, a history of smoking, pre-radiation
surgery and pelvic infection are factors correlated with increased risk of
major complications.
VI. Pathology of cervical cancer
The vast majority of cervical cancers are
epithelial tumors with squamous cell carcinomas accounting for about 80% of the
primary tumors in the cervix (Figure 1, Platz and Benda, 1999).

Figure 1. Invasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix with focal necrosis (H and E
section).
Rarely tumors of glandular origin and small cell carcinomas are
seen (Han et al, 2000; Zarka et al, 2003). Squamous carcinomas may have varying
degrees of differentiation and amounts of keratin formation. In addition to HPV
infection, cervical cancers frequently harbor other genetic alterations that
herald other steps in oncogenesis (Carico 2001; Klaes et al, 2001) These most
frequently include p16 and p53 (Keating et al, 2001; Finegan et al, 2004). p16
has been shown to be expressed in a large proportion of cervical squamous
carcinomas (approximately 70% or more). The regulation of this tumor suppressor
protein, presumably involves an HPV dependent pathway (Sano et al, 1998, 2002).
Current studies are underway to examine the utility of p16 as an adjunctive marker
for cervical cancer screening (Lin et al, 2000; Bibbo et al, 2002; Klaes et al,
2002).
In addition our group has been interested
in examining the role of adhesion protein expression in cancers of the cervix.
We have seen the cell-cell adhesion marker P-cadherin as a good marker for
glandular tumors of the cervix (Han et al, 2000), and often seen in increasing
frequency in dysplastic to frankly neoplastic glandular tumors. In small cell
cancers of the cervix, we have shown that the neural adhesion protein
N-cadherin may be a tumor suppressor protein that is operative in the
development of these tumors (Zarka et al, 2003) Recent studies on the
oncogenetic profiles of cervical squamous carcinoma has uncovered tumor
heterogeneity, suggesting that these tumors are not static, but undergo
additional mutations and expression or loss of oncogenes, probably as a result
of tumor clonal selection or tumor evolution (manuscript in preparation)
The last thirty years has seen dramatic
change in the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the United States.
This has been most dramatically affected by the effective screening program
associated with the pap smear. Cervical cancer continues to be a significant
disease worldwide, and we are understanding more and more of the tumor biology
involved, and optimizing current treatment approaches to the disease. Future
studies will hopefully uncover best practices for screening strategies for
developed and developing countries, as well as preventative options (Lorincz,
1996; Cronje, 2004; Lee et al, 2004; Suba, 2004) Since HPV is the cause of
cervical cancer in the majority of cases, research looking at eradicating HPV
infection, specifically through vaccine trials is an area of significant
interest, and holds much promise (Wolf et al, 2003; Sterlinko and Banks, 2004).
American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (2002) ACOG practice
bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 78, 79-91
Baseman JG, Koutsky LA (2005) The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol 32 (Suppl), 16-24.
Bibbo M, Klump WJ, DeCecco J and Kovatich AJ (2002) Procedure for immuno-cytochemical
detection of p16INK4A Antigen in thin-layer liquid- based specimens.
Acta Cytol 46, 25-29
Castellsague X, Bosch FX, Munoz N (2002) Environmental co-factors in HPV
carcinogenesis. Virus Res 89, 191-199.
Carico E, Atlante M, Bucci B, Nofroni I and
Vecchione A (2001) E-cadherin and
a-catenin expression during tumor progression of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 80, 156-161
Chiang SH and Quek ST (2003) Carcinoma of the cervix: role of MR imaging. Ann Acad Med Singapore 32, 550-556.
Cronje HS (2004)
Screening for cervical cancer in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84, 101-108
Finegan MM, Han AC, Edelson MI and Rosenblum NG
(2004) p16 expression in squamous
lesions of the female genital tract. J
Molec Histol 35, 111-114
Ferenczy A, Franco E (2002) Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical
neoplasia. Lancet Oncol 3, 11-16.
Foulks MJ (1998)
The Papanicolaou smear: its impact on the promotion of women's health. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 27, 367-373.
Franco EL, Schlecht NF, Saslow D (2003) The epidemiology of cervical
cancer. Cancer J 9, 348-359.
Frazer IH (2004)
Prevention of cervical cancer through papillomavirus vaccination. Nat Rev Immunol 4, 46-54.
Giarre M, Caldeira S, Malanchi I, Ciccolini F,
Leao MJ and Tommasino M (2001)
Induction of pRb degradation by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is
essential to efficiently overcome p16INK4A-imposed G1 cell cycle
arrest. J Virol 75, 4705-4712
Graflund M, Sorbe B, Sigurdardottir S, Karlsson
M (2004) HPV-DNA, vascular space
invasion and their impact on the clinical outcome in early-stage cervical carcinomas.
Int J Gynecol Cancer 14, 896-902
Greven K, Petereit D, Vermorken JB, Lanciano R (1999) Current developments in the
treatment of newly diagnosed cervical cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 13, 275-303
Han AC, Edelson MI, Peralta Soler A, Knudsen KA,
Lifschitz-Mercer B, Czernobilsky B, Rosenblum NG and Salazar H (2000) Cadherin expression in glandular
tumors of the cervix. Aberrant P-cadherin expression as a possible marker of
malignancy. Cancer 89, 20
Hirama T, Miller CW, Wilczynski SP and Koeffler
HP (1996) p16
(CDKN2/cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor/multiple tumor suppressor-1) gene is
not altered in uterine cervical carcinoma cell lines. Mod Pathol 9, 26-31
Keating JT, Ince T and Crum CP (2001) Surrogate biomarkers of HPV
infection in cervical neoplasia screening and diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 8, 82-92
Kim JH, Kim HJ, Hong S, Wu HG, Ha SW (2005) Post-hysterectomy radiotherapy in
FIGO stage IB-IIB uterine cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 96, 407-414.
Klaes R, Benner A, Friedrich T, Ridder R, Herrington
S, Jenkins D, Kurman, RJ, Schmidt D, Stoler M and von Knebel Doeberitz MK (2002) p16INK4A
immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J
Surg Pathol 26, 1389-99.
Klaes R, Friedrich T, Spitkovsky D, Ridder R,
Rudy W, Petry U, Dallenbach-Hellweg G, Schmidt D and von Knebel Doeberitz M (2001) Overexpression of p16INK4A
as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the
cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 92,
276-84.
Kumar R, Alavi A (2004) PET imaging in gynecologic malignancies. Radiol Clin North Am 42, 1155-1167
Lee CM, Lee RJ, Hammond E, Tsodikov A, Dodson M,
Zempolich K, Gaffney DK (2004)
Expression of HER2neu (c-erbB-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor in cervical
cancer: prognostic correlation with clinical characteristics, and comparison of
manual and automated imaging analysis. Gynecol
Oncol 93, 209-14.
Lin WM, Ashfaq R, Michalopulos EA, Maitra A,
Gazdar AF and Muller CY (2000)
Molecular Papanicolaou tests in the twenty-first century: Molecular analyses
with fluid-based Papanicolaou technology. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 183, 39-45
Lorincz AT (1996)
Hybrid capture method for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in clinical
specimens. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 22,
629-636
Lu KH and Burke TW (2000) Early cervical cancer. Curr
Treat Options Oncol 1, 147-155
Mota F (2003)
Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix: treatment modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82, 505-509
Munger K, Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Howley PM
(1992) Interactions of HPV E6 and E7
oncoproteins with tumour suppressor gene products. Cancer Surv 12, 197-217.
Nakashima R, Fujita M, Enomoto T, Haba T,
Yoshino K, Wada HKH, Sasaki M, Wakasa K, Inoue M, Buzard G and Murata Y (1999) Alteration of p16 and p15 genes
in human uterine tumours. Br J Cancer
80, 458-467
Negri G, Egarter-Vigl E, Kasal A, Romano F,
Haitel A and Mian C (2003) p16INK4A
is a useful marker for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri and
its precursors. An immunohistochemical study with immunocytochemical
correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 27,
187-93.
Pecorelli S and Odicino F (2003) Cervical cancer staging. Cancer
J 9, 390-394
Platz CE and Benda JA (1995) Female genital tract cancer. Cancer 75, 270-294
Rohan TE, Burk RD, Franco EL (2003) Toward a reduction of the global
burden of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(4 Suppl), S37-9
Sano T, Oyama T, Kashiwabara K, Fukuda T and
Nakajima T (1998) Expression status
of p16 protein is associated with human papillomavirus oncogenic potential in
cervical and genital lesions. Am J
Pathol 153, 1741-1748
Sano T, Masuda N, Oyama T and Nakajima T (2002) Overexpression of p16 and p14ARF
is associated with human papillomavirus infection in cervical squamous cell
carcinoma and dysplasia. Pathol Int
52, 375-383
Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2004) Persistent area socioeconomic
disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage and
survival, 1975-2000. Cancer 101,
1051-7
Sterlinko GH and Banks L (2004) HPV proteins as targets for therapeutic intervention. Antivir Ther. 9, 665-678
Stoler MH (2003)
The virology of cervical neoplasia: an HPV-associated malignancy. Cancer J 9, 360-367
Suba EJ (2004)
Crossing the quality chasm: a requirement for successful cervical cancer
prevention in developing countries. Clin
Lab Med 24, 945-963
Wang SS, Sherman ME, Hildesheim A, Lacey JV Jr,
Devesa S (2004) Cervical
adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women
and black women in the United States for 1976-2000. Cancer 100, 1035-1044
Wolf JK, Franco EL, Arbeit JM, Shroyer KR, Wu
TC, Runowicz CD, Tortolero-Luna G, Herrero R, Crum CP (2003) Innovations in understanding the biology of cervical cancer. Cancer 98(9 Suppl), 2064-2069
Zarka TA, Han AC, Edelson MI and Rosenblum NG (2003) Expression of cadherins, p53 and
BCL2 in small cell carcinomas of the cervix: Potential tumor suppressor role
for N-cadherin. Int J Gynecol Cancer
13, 240-243.