Cancer Therapy Vol 1, 275-281, 2003.
Protein kinase C-d and its
downstream effectors as potential targets for cancer therapy
Jihua Liu, David Durrant and Ray M. Lee*
Huntsman Cancer Institute and Section of Oncology,
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt
Lake City, UT, 84112
__________________________________________________________________________________
*Correspondence: Ray M. Lee; Phone:
801-585-0611; Fax: 801-585-0900; e-mail: ray.lee@hci.utah.edu
Key Words: Protein kinase C-d, cancer therapy, apoptosis
Abbreviations: Protein kinase C (PKC);
nerve-growth factor, (NGF); Cytarabine, (ara-C); stress-activator protein
kinase, (SAPK); mitogen-activated protein kinase, (MAPK); phospholipid
scramblase 3, (PLS3); phospholipid scramblase 1, (PLS1); non-small cell lung
cancer, (NSCLC); phosphatidylserine, (PS); chronic myelocytic leukemia, (CML)
Summary
The Protein kinase C (PKC) family of
serine/threonine protein kinases are important in many biologic processes. The
PKC-d
isoform is particularly involved in the regulation of cell death. During
programmed cell death, PKC-d translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus,
mitochondria, Golgi and plasma membrane. Several key substrates of PKC-d in the nucleus and mitochondria have been
identified, and the linkage of these PKC-d targets to regulation of DNA damage checkpoints
and mitochondrial apoptosis helps to elucidate the mechanism of PKC-d-induced apoptosis. Here we review the apoptotic
effects of PKC-d and its substrates in various organelles, and
discuss the possibility of using these targets to develop novel approaches for
cancer therapy.
In the post genomic era, the trend for developing novel cancer therapy is based on identification of molecular targets. This kind of mechanism-based drug development requires a comprehensive understanding of the function of molecular targets, their upstream activators and downstream effectors. In addition to utilizing kinases or other signal transduction mediators as targets, members of apoptotic pathways also serve as potentially useful targets due to the possibility of directly inducing cell death and minimizing the development of drug resistance. Here we review the biology of the apoptotic pathway involving PKC-d and the possibility of using PKC-d and its downstream effectors as potential targets for novel cancer therapy.
Members of
the Protein kinase C (PKC) family play diverse roles in many biological
processes (Parker, 1997). Isoforms of the PKC family can be divided
into three groups based on their interaction with and dependence on calcium and
diacylglycerol. The classic PKCs, including isoforms a, bI, bII and g, require both calcium and diacylglycerol
for activation. The novel PKCs, including d, e, h, and q, are independent of calcium but require
diacylglycerol for activation. The atypical PKCs, including l and z, are
independent of both calcium and diacylglycerol. Each isoform plays different
roles in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis (Ohno, 1997). Due to their important roles in many
different cancers, PKCs could be potential targets for developing novel cancer
therapies. For example, treatments utilizing antisense oligonucleotides
directed against PKC-a are in clinical development for several
cancers (Wang et al, 1999;
Roychowdhury and Lahn, 2003). Bryostatin, a compound that inhibits PKC-a, has gone
through phase I clinical trials (Hofmann, 2001; Marshall et al, 2002; Swannie
and Kaye, 2002). However, these two approaches target PKC-a, the most
well-characterized isoform. Utilization of other PKC isoforms has not yet been
realized.
The balance of survival and apoptotic signals
determines cancer cell death, the ultimate goal of cancer therapy (Cory and Adams, 1998; Reed, 1999; Adams and Cory, 2001;
Green and Evan, 2002). Although therapeutic approaches that block survival signals may tip
the balance toward cell death, blocking such survival signals does not
necessarily mean that cancer cells will automatically undergo apoptosis. In
contrast, induction of apoptosis through modulation of key factors in the
apoptotic pathway would have a direct and dominant effect on cells. Thus direct
activation of the cell death response may be a better approach for cancer
therapies. In this review, we focus on the PKC isoform best characterized in
triggering apoptosis, PKC-d (Brodie and Blumberg, 2003). Compared with PKC-a, which provides a survival and proliferation signal, PKC-d provides a more direct target to enhance apoptosis (Mandil et al, 2001).
Involvement of PKC-d in apoptosis was first demonstrated by
activation of PKC-d in cells treated with a variety of
apoptotic stimuli, including H2O2 (Konishi et al, 2001; Majumder et al, 2001), TNF-a (Emoto et al, 1995), the Fas ligand (Scheel-Toellner et al, 1999), UV and g irradiation (Denning et al, 1998; Yuan et al, 1998), and etoposide treatment (Reyland et al, 1999; Blass et al, 2002). Inhibition of PKC-d activity by a
PKC-d-specific inhibitor, rottlerin, or by a dominant
negative mutant resulted in suppression of the apoptotic response (Li et al, 1999; Majumder et al, 2000). Another important clue was shown in PKC-d-deficient
mice, which had an increased B cell population and formed numerous germinal
centers in the absence of stimulation (Mecklenbrauker et al, 2002; Miyamoto et al,
2002). The observed abnormal B cell
proliferation was associated with enhanced autoimmunity due to the persistence
of self antigen-recognizing B cells that failed to undergo apoptosis during
positive selection. Analysis of these knockout mice thus established a role for
PKC-d in controlling B-cell apoptosis in the regulation of
B cell tolerance.
Regulation of PKC-d activity is mediated by
at least three mechanisms. The regulatory C1 domain has an inhibitory effect on
the catalytic domain found at the carboxyl terminus (Ohno, 1997; Parker, 1997).
One way to release inhibition is by interaction of diacylglycerol or phorbol
esters with the C1 domain, which triggers a conformational change. A second
mechanism is mediated by cleavage of the catalytic domain from the C1
regulatory domain, which is achieved during apoptosis by activated caspase 3 (Ghayur et al, 1996; Denning et al, 2002).
Tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC-d at Tyr64 and 187 is essential
for the cleavage and the apoptotic effect of PKC-d (Blass et al, 2002).
Tyr311 phosphorylation by Lck kinase after H2O2 treatment
enhances basal PKC-d activity and elevates its maximal activity in the
presence of diacylglycerol (Konishi et al, 2001).
Finally, activated PKC-d undergoes ubiquitination and degradation through the
proteasome pathway, which prevents a persistent effect of PKC-d (Lu et al, 1998).
Depending on the cell
types and the apoptotic stimuli, PKC-d has been reported to translocate to nearly all
subcellular organelles, including nuclei, mitochondria, the Golgi complex,
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane (Brodie and Blumberg, 2003; Roychowdhury and Lahn, 2003). At each subcellular organelle, PKC-d phosphorylates different substrates, inducing various
responses that eventually lead to cell death. Identification of the substrates
is critical to understanding the mechanism of PKC-d, but it has been very challenging to identify
physiologic substrates in each organelle. We define three criteria that must be
met to convincingly claim any protein as a physiologic substrate of PKC-d; (1) there must be evidence that PKC-d phosphorylates the protein, (2) there should be
evidence for their interaction, and (3) most importantly, deletion or
inactivation of the substrate must lead to at least a partial loss of PKC-d-induced response. Here we review several known
substrates of PKC-d with a goal of connecting these substrates to the apoptotic pathway so
that we can understand how PKC-d induces apoptosis.
Translocation of PKC-d to the nucleus has been established in T cells and C6
glioma cells (Scheel-Toellner et al,
1999; Blass et al, 2002). A putative nuclear localization signal has been identified at the
carboxyl terminus of the catalytic domain of PKC-d (DeVries et al, 2002). Previously, nucleolin, which is required for nerve-growth factor
(NGF)-induced differentiation of pheochromocytoma cells PC12, was identified as
a substrate of PKC-z (Zhou et al, 1997). However, neither PKC-a nor PKC-d can phosphorylate nucleolin, and nucleolin is not
involved in the apoptotic response.
Recently, Yoshida et al, (2003) reported that PKC-d is responsible for constitutive and DNA
damage-induced phosphorylation of Rad9, a key factor involved in checkpoint
regulation of the DNA damage response (al-Khodairy et al, 1994). The authors also demonstrated an interaction between PKC-d and Rad9, and showed that PKC-d phosphorylated Rad9 both in vitro and in cells treated with Cytarabine (ara-C) or g-irradiation (Yoshida et al, 2003). Nuclear Rad9 forms a critical heterotrimeric complex with Hus1 and
Rad1, the 9-1-1 complex that is involved in DNA damage checkpoint control (Volkmer and Karnitz, 1999). PKC-d, which translocated to the nucleus during apoptosis, enhanced the
phosphorylation of Rad9 and the formation of the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 complex (Yoshida et al, 2003). Interestingly, Rad9 is also phosphorylated by ATM (Chen et al, 2001) and c-Abl (Yoshida et al, 2002). The latter kinase also interacts with PKC-d (Sun et al, 2000a, b). Using ATM siRNA to down-regulate the level of ATM, a diminished
nuclear targeting of PKC-d was observed, suggesting that ATM is required for nuclear targeting of
PKC-d and is functionally
upstream of PKC-d (Yoshida et al, 2003). These studies provide a direct linkage between PKC-d and DNA damage-induced checkpoint regulation, and
form the basis for future studies of the mechanism of PKC-d-induced apoptosis.
Another downstream effector of PKC-d in DNA damage response in cells treated with ara-C is
stress-activator protein kinase (SAPK/JNK) (Yoshida et al, 2002) (Figure 1). DNA
damage-induced SAPK/JNK activation was attenuated by rottlerin, a dominant
negative mutant of PKC-d, and PKC-d siRNA. PKC-d did not directly phosphorylate SAPK/JNK, rather SAPK/JNK was
indirectly phosphorylated through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
pathway, PKC-d ¨
MEKK1 ¨
MKK7 ¨
SAPK/JNK (Yoshida et al, 2002). The finding that SAPK/JNK is a downstream effector of PKC-d provides another mechanism of PKC-d-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, SAPK/JNK was shown
to be the substrate of PKC-b and to translocate to mitochondria after
phosphorylation to induce cytochrome c release (Ito et al, 2001a).
Translocation of PKC-d to mitochondria was shown in U937 myeloid leukemia
cells and keratinocytes (Li et al, 1999; Majumder et
al, 2000). The translocation can be induced by phorbol ester (Denning et al, 1998) and the oxidative stress (Majumder et al, 2001). With UV irradiation, mitochondrial targeted PKC-d was cleaved by caspase 3 to generate the active
catalytic fragment of PKC-d (Denning et al, 2002). One known substrate of PKC-d is c-Abl kinase (Sun et al, 2000a). It has been demonstrated that PKC-d interacts with c-Abl, and that the phosphorylation of
c-Abl results in activation of c-Abl kinase. Cells treated with H2O2
had an increase in c-Abl activity, which was attenuated by the PKC-d inhibitor, rottlerin, and by overexpression of the
regulatory domain of PKC-d (Sun et al, 2000a). In the unstimulated condition, c-Abl localized to the nucleus, ER and
cytoplasm. On ER stress caused by calcium ionophore A23187, brefeldin A or
tunicamycin treatment, c-Abl translocated to mitochondria (Ito et al, 2001b).
Figure
1. Diagram of PKC-d and its downstream effectors in DNA damage-induced
apoptosis. PKC-d is localized in the cytoplasm before the induction of apoptosis. When
DNA is damaged by apoptotic stimuli, PKC-d translocates to the nucleus, where it phosphorylates
Rad9 and c-Abl and activates MEKK1. PKC-d also translocates to mitochondria, where it
phosphorylates PLS3 and c-Abl, and to the Golgi, where it phosphorylates c-Abl
and SAPK/JNK. In the plasma membrane, PKC-d phosphorylates PLS1. The pathway from DNA damage to
checkpoint activation and apoptosis is outlined.
Cardiolipin
translocation is directly tied to the sensitivity of Cardiolipin translocation
is directly tied to the sensitivity of mitochondria to tBid-induced cytochrome
c release. Because tBid targeting to the mitochondria is mediated by
cardiolipin (Lutter et al, 2000), the translocation of cardiolipin from the inner membrane to outer
membrane facilitates the recruitment of tBid (Liu et al, 2003b). This idea was confirmed by the finding that mitochondria
overexpressing PLS3 were more sensitive to tBid-induced cytochrome c release,
whereas those expressing inactive mutant PLS3 were more resistant (Liu et al, 2003b).
VIII. PKC-d substrates in the plasma Another member of PLS family, PLS1, has been shown to
be a target of PKC-d in the plasma membrane (Frasch et al, 2000). PLS1 is phosphorylated by PKC-d at a PKC phosphorylation consensus site, Thr161.
Co-expression of PKC-d and PLS1 significantly increased the activity of scramblase following
PMA treatment (Frasch et al, 2000). In contrast, co-expression of PKC-d and a T161A mutant of PLS1 showed no increase in
scramblase activity, indicating that phosphorylation of Thr161 by PKC-d is important for scramblase function (Frasch et al, 2000). In addition, PLS1 can be phosphorylated by c-Abl, a kinase known to
interact with PKC-d in other organelles (Sun et al, 2001).
Although there is solid evidence that PLS1 is
activated during apoptosis (Zhao et al, 1998 ; Frasch et al, 2000), a direct link between PLS1 and apoptosis has not been fully
established. During apoptosis, phosphatidylserine (PS) translocates from the
inner leaflet to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. The regulation of
transbilayer movement of phospholipids is controlled by at least three enzymes.
One is aminophospholipid translocase, or flippase, which moves phospholipids
inwards. One is the phospholipid scramblase (PLS1) that moves phospholipids
bidirectionally. The third is a less well-characterized outward-directed
floppase (Bevers et al, 1999). Probably due to the complexity of the regulation of phospholipid
topology in lipid bilayers, cells from mice with homozygous for a deletion of
PLS1 still maintain their ability to translocate PS to the surface (Zhou et al, 2002). This could presumably be due to compensation by aminophospholipid
translocase activity. Therefore the mechanism of surface translocation of PS
remains unclear. It has been hypothesized that apoptosis is associated with
inactivation of aminophospholipid translocase and activation of the scramblase (Bevers et al, 1998; 1999), but definitive proof of this hypothesis has not yet been
materialized.